Leprosy Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Mar 15;5(3):e1013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001013.
This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with developing leprosy among the contacts of newly-diagnosed leprosy patients.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 6,158 contacts and 1,201 leprosy patients of the cohort who were diagnosed and treated at the Leprosy Laboratory of Fiocruz from 1987 to 2007 were included. The contact variables analyzed were sex; age; educational and income levels; blood relationship, if any, to the index case; household or non-household relationship; length of time of close association with the index case; receipt of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BGG) vaccine and presence of BCG scar. Index cases variables included sex, age, educational level, family size, bacillary load, and disability grade. Multilevel logistic regression with random intercept was applied. Among the co-prevalent cases, the leprosy-related variables that remained associated with leprosy included type of household contact, [odds ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.73] and consanguinity with the index case, (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.42-2.51). With respect to the index case variables, the factors associated with leprosy among contacts included up to 4 years of schooling and 4 to 10 years of schooling (OR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.54-4.79 and 2.40, 95% CI: 1.30-4.42, respectively) and bacillary load, which increased the chance of leprosy among multibacillary contacts for those with a bacillary index of one to three and greater than three (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.19-2.17 and OR: 4.07-95% CI: 2.73, 6.09), respectively. Among incident cases, household exposure was associated with leprosy (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.29-2.98), compared with non-household exposure. Among the index case risk factors, an elevated bacillary load was the only variable associated with leprosy in the contacts.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Biological and social factors appear to be associated with leprosy among co-prevalent cases, whereas the factors related to the infectious load and proximity with the index case were associated with leprosy that appeared in the incident cases during follow-up.
本研究旨在评估新诊断麻风病患者的接触者中发生麻风病的相关风险因素。
方法/主要发现:共纳入了 1987 年至 2007 年期间在 Fiocruz 麻风病实验室被诊断和治疗的 6158 名接触者和 1201 名麻风病患者。分析的接触者变量包括性别;年龄;教育和收入水平;与指数病例的血缘关系(如果有);家庭或非家庭关系;与指数病例密切接触的时间长短;卡介苗(BCG)疫苗的接种情况和 BCG 疤痕的存在。指数病例变量包括性别、年龄、教育程度、家庭规模、细菌载量和残疾程度。采用带有随机截距的多级逻辑回归。在共现病例中,与麻风病相关的变量与麻风病仍相关,包括家庭接触类型(OR=1.33,95%CI:1.02-1.73)和与指数病例的血缘关系(OR=1.89,95%CI:1.42-2.51)。对于指数病例变量,与接触者麻风病相关的因素包括接受 4 年及以下和 4-10 年的学校教育(OR=2.72,95%CI:1.54-4.79 和 2.40,95%CI:1.30-4.42)以及细菌载量,这增加了多菌性接触者患麻风病的机会,对于细菌指数为 1-3 和大于 3 的患者(OR=1.79,95%CI:1.19-2.17 和 OR:4.07-95%CI:2.73-6.09)。在新发病例中,与非家庭接触相比,家庭暴露与麻风病相关(OR=1.96,95%CI:1.29-2.98)。在指数病例的危险因素中,细菌载量升高是与接触者中麻风病相关的唯一变量。
结论/意义:生物和社会因素似乎与共现病例中的麻风病有关,而与传染性负荷和与指数病例的接近程度相关的因素与随访中新出现的病例中的麻风病有关。