Suppr超能文献

重组卵泡刺激素与高纯度卵泡刺激素在宫腔内人工授精中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Recombinant FSH versus highly purified FSH in intrauterine insemination: systematic review and metaanalysis.

机构信息

Human Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Cruces, Pais Vasco University, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1937-42, 1942.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pregnancy rates (PRs) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) using recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) or highly purified urinary FSH (HP-FSH).

DESIGN

Systematic review and metaanalysis.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S): None.

INTERVENTION(S): Electronic and manual searches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): PR, per first cycle PR and per woman PR.

RESULT(S): Six randomized trials (713 women, 1,581 cycles) were identified. In three the same doses of rec-FSH and HP-FSH were used ("equal dose" group), whereas in the other three the ratio HP-FSH:rec-FSH dose was 1.5. The global metaanalysis showed no differences in PRs. The PR per cycle was similar across the 1.5 ratio group (14.51% vs. 14.93%; relative risk [RR], 0.970; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.687-1.369). However, the metaanalysis of the equal dose group, showed differences in the PR in favor of rec-FSH (16.36% vs. 12.31%; RR, 1.394; 95% CI, 1.004-1.936). Per woman PR analysis showed similar results (41.44% vs. 31.55%; RR, 1.273; 95% CI, 0.987-1.643). Per first cycle PR analysis showed a similar trend, although the difference did not reach significance (RR, 1.434; 95% CI, 0.934-2.203).

CONCLUSION(S): Rec-FSH was associated with higher per cycle PR than HP-FSH, when used at the same dose, whereas the PR were similar when the dose of rec-FSH was 50% lower.

摘要

目的

比较使用重组促卵泡激素(rec-FSH)和高纯度尿促卵泡激素(HP-FSH)进行宫腔内人工授精(IUI)的妊娠率(PR)。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

地点

大学医院。

患者

无。

干预措施

电子和手动搜索。

主要观察指标

PR、首次周期 PR 和每位妇女 PR。

结果

共确定了 6 项随机试验(713 名女性,1581 个周期)。其中 3 项试验使用了相同剂量的 rec-FSH 和 HP-FSH(“等剂量”组),而另外 3 项试验的 HP-FSH:rec-FSH 剂量比为 1.5。总体荟萃分析显示 PR 无差异。在 1.5 比例组中,每个周期的 PR 相似(14.51% vs. 14.93%;相对风险 [RR],0.970;95%置信区间 [CI],0.687-1.369)。然而,等剂量组的荟萃分析显示,rec-FSH 有利于 PR(16.36% vs. 12.31%;RR,1.394;95% CI,1.004-1.936)。每位妇女 PR 分析显示出相似的结果(41.44% vs. 31.55%;RR,1.273;95% CI,0.987-1.643)。首次周期 PR 分析显示出相似的趋势,尽管差异无统计学意义(RR,1.434;95% CI,0.934-2.203)。

结论

当使用相同剂量时,rec-FSH 与更高的每个周期 PR 相关,而当 rec-FSH 剂量降低 50%时,PR 相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验