School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, and Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.023. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
This study compared home-based constraint-induced therapy (CIT) with a dose-matched home-based control intervention for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The differences in unilateral and bilateral motor performance, daily functions, and quality of parental well-being (i.e., the stress level of their parents) were evaluated. The study included 21 children with CP (age range, 48-119 months) who were randomly assigned to the CIT or control group. All participants received individualized home-based interventions, 3.5-4h a day, twice a week for 4weeks. Primary outcomes were measured by the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales II (PDMS-2) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) is the whole name of the assessment. All first letters of this instrument title should be in upper case. Secondary outcome measures were the Pediatric Motor Activity Log (PMAL), the Caregiver Functional Use Survey (CFUS), and the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI). Outcome measures were performed at baseline (pretreatment), 4weeks (posttreatment), and 6-month (follow-up). Compared with the control group, the CIT group exhibited significantly better performance in grasping control as measured by the PDMS-2, unilateral/bilateral motor efficacy as measured by the BOTMP, and unilateral hand function as measured by the PMAL immediately after the treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, CIT had beneficial effects on grasping control assessed by PDMS-2 and on unilateral/bilateral functional performance measured by the PMAL and CFUS. Parents in both groups reported comparable stress levels at the 6-month follow-up, although the parent-child dysfunctional interaction deteriorated more immediately after CIT than after the control intervention. The follow-up of this randomized controlled trial suggested beneficial effects of home-based CIT on unilateral grasping skills and unilateral/bilateral functional performance at 6 months. The higher stress level reported by the parents in the CIT group than in the control group at posttreatment is temporary and could be alleviated at a longer period of time. Home-based CIT is a feasible and effective alternative to the intervention administered at clinics.
这项研究比较了家庭为基础的强制性诱导治疗(CIT)与剂量匹配的家庭为基础的对照干预对脑瘫儿童的影响。评估了单侧和双侧运动表现、日常功能以及父母的健康状况(即父母的压力水平)的差异。该研究纳入了 21 名脑瘫儿童(年龄 48-119 个月),他们被随机分配到 CIT 组或对照组。所有参与者均接受个体化的家庭干预,每天 3.5-4 小时,每周两次,共 4 周。主要结局指标采用 Peabody 发育运动量表第二版(PDMS-2)和布鲁因克斯-奥塞尔斯基运动能力测试(BOTMP)进行评估。次要结局指标包括儿童运动活动日志(PMAL)、照顾者功能使用调查(CFUS)和父母压力指数-短式量表(PSI)。在基线(治疗前)、4 周(治疗后)和 6 个月(随访)时进行了结局评估。与对照组相比,CIT 组在 PDMS-2 评估的抓握控制、BOTMP 评估的单侧/双侧运动效能以及 PMAL 评估的单侧手功能方面的表现明显更好。在治疗后即刻,CIT 组在 PDMS-2 评估的抓握控制和 PMAL 和 CFUS 评估的单侧/双侧功能表现方面,在 6 个月随访时仍具有获益。CIT 对 PDMS-2 评估的抓握控制和 PMAL 和 CFUS 评估的单侧/双侧功能表现具有有益的影响。尽管 CIT 后家长与孩子的功能障碍交互作用比对照组更严重,但两组家长在 6 个月随访时报告的压力水平相当。这项随机对照试验的随访结果提示,家庭为基础的 CIT 可在 6 个月时改善单侧抓握技能和单侧/双侧功能表现。虽然 CIT 组在治疗后比对照组的家长报告更高的压力水平,但这种压力水平是暂时的,在更长的时间内可能会得到缓解。家庭为基础的 CIT 是一种可行且有效的替代方案,可替代诊所内的干预措施。