Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou; Graduate Institute of Early Intervention, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
To investigate the long-term effects of home-based constraint induced therapy (CIT) on motor control underlying functional change in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP).
Randomized controlled trial.
Home based.
Children with unilateral CP (N=45; aged 6-12 y) were randomly assigned to receive home-based CIT (n=23) or traditional rehabilitation (TR) (n=22).
Both groups received a 4-week therapist-based intervention at home. The home-based CIT involved intensive functional training of the more affected upper extremity during which the less affected one was restrained. The TR involved functional unimanual and bimanual training.
All children underwent kinematic and clinical assessments at baseline, 4 weeks (posttreatment), and 3 and 6 months (follow-up). The reach-to-grasp kinematics were reaction time (RT), normalized movement time, normalized movement unit, peak velocity (PV), maximum grip aperture (MGA), and percentage of movement where MGA occurs. The clinical measures were the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, Second Edition (PDMS-2), Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP), and Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM).
The home-based CIT group showed a shorter RT (P<.05) and normalized movement time (P<.01), smaller MGA (P=.006), and fewer normalized movement units (P=.014) in the reach-to-grasp movements at posttreatment and follow-up than the TR group. The home-based CIT group improved more on the PDMS-2 (P<.001) and WeeFIM (P<.01) in all posttreatment tests and on the BOTMP (P<.01) at follow-up than the TR group.
The home-based CIT induced better spatial and temporal efficiency (smoother movement, more efficient grasping, better movement preplanning and execution) for functional improvement up to 6 months after treatment than TR.
研究基于家庭的强制性诱导治疗(CIT)对单侧脑瘫(CP)儿童功能变化所涉及的运动控制的长期影响。
随机对照试验。
家庭。
45 名单侧 CP 儿童(年龄 6-12 岁)被随机分配接受家庭 CIT(n=23)或传统康复(TR)(n=22)。
两组均在家中接受为期 4 周的治疗师为基础的干预。家庭 CIT 包括对较严重的上肢进行强化功能性训练,同时限制较轻的上肢活动。TR 包括功能性单手和双手训练。
所有儿童在基线、4 周(治疗后)、3 个月和 6 个月(随访)进行运动学和临床评估。伸手抓握的运动学指标包括反应时间(RT)、正常运动时间、正常运动单位、峰值速度(PV)、最大握持开口(MGA)和 MGA 发生的运动百分比。临床评估指标为 Peabody 发育运动量表第二版(PDMS-2)、Bruininks-Oseretsky 运动能力测试(BOTMP)和儿童功能性独立性测量(WeeFIM)。
治疗后和随访时,家庭 CIT 组的伸手抓握运动的 RT(P<.05)和正常运动时间(P<.01)更短、MGA 更小(P=.006)、正常运动单位更少(P=.014),而 TR 组则没有。与 TR 组相比,家庭 CIT 组在所有治疗后测试中的 PDMS-2(P<.001)和 WeeFIM(P<.01)以及随访时的 BOTMP(P<.01)得分均有显著改善。
与 TR 相比,家庭 CIT 可在治疗后 6 个月内诱导更好的空间和时间效率(更流畅的运动、更高效的抓握、更好的运动预规划和执行),从而促进功能改善。