• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.

作者信息

Parekh Mitesh, Swift Steven, Lemos Nucelio, Iskander Mohsen, Freeman Bob, Arunkalaivanan A S, Martan Alois, Sorinola Olanrewaju, Rizk Diaa, Halaska Michael, Surkont Grzegorz, Medina Carlos, Conceicao Jose Carlos, Korte Jeffrey E

机构信息

Prime Care of SE OH, Genesis Health System, 1210, Ashland Avenue, Zanesville, OH 43701, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):645-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2
PMID:21431391
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system's use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615-620, 2006).

METHODS

Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is an almost perfect inter-examiner agreement of the S-POP system for the overall stage and each point within the system.

摘要

相似文献

1
Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):645-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
2
Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.一种使用POPQ盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的简化技术的验证
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0076-z. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
3
Comparative study to evaluate the intersystem association and reliability between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system.评估标准盆腔器官脱垂量化系统与简化盆腔器官脱垂评分系统之间的系统间关联及可靠性的比较研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Dec;64(6):421-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0537-0. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
4
[Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system].[在盆腔器官脱垂分期临床实践中应用简化的盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统：与标准盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统的比较分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 25;51(7):510-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.07.006.
5
Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 May;23(5):579-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1593-y. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
6
The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse.简化盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（S-POP）与标准盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（POPQ）在描述盆腔器官脱垂方面的系统间关联。
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1286-y. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
7
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局：一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Index (POP-Q-I): a novel interpretation of the POP-Q system for optimization of POP research.盆腔器官脱垂定量指数（POP-Q-I）的验证：对POP-Q系统的一种新解读，以优化盆腔器官脱垂研究。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jul;19(7):995-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0556-9. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
9
Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.物理治疗师使用盆腔器官脱垂量化系统测量脱垂的可行性、评分者间和评分者内信度。
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jun;21(6):651-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
10
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification use in the literature.盆腔器官脱垂量化在文献中的应用。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):35-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bd1ab.

引用本文的文献

1
International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction.国际尿妇科咨询第二章委员会 3：盆腔器官脱垂的临床评估，包括相关发病率/盆底功能障碍的调查。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2657-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05629-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
2
Manchester Procedure vs Sacrospinous Hysteropexy for Treatment of Uterine Descent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.曼彻斯特手术与骶棘韧带固定术治疗子宫脱垂的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):626-635. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13140.
3
Comparison of outcomes between pessary use and surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective self-controlled study.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals.在选定专业期刊的已发表文章中盆腔器官脱垂分期系统的应用
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):359-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1044-1. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.一种使用POPQ盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的简化技术的验证
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0076-z. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
3
Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects.
比较症状性盆腔器官脱垂使用子宫托和手术治疗的效果：一项前瞻性自身对照研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):214-220. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210395.
4
Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.伊朗盆腔器官脱垂女性的临床分期中盆腔器官脱垂定量和简化盆腔器官脱垂定量系统的比较。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020 Nov;30(6):921-928. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.10.
5
Posterior pelvic tilt is a risk factor for rectal prolapse: a propensity score matching analysis.骨盆后倾是直肠前突的一个危险因素：一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 May;24(5):463-469. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02179-9. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
Efficacy and patient satisfaction of pelvic organ prolapse reduction using transvaginal mesh: A Canadian perspective.经阴道网状物治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及患者满意度：加拿大视角
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Oct;12(10):E432-E437. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5095. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.机器人辅助脱垂手术后的性功能：一项前瞻性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3645-z. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.IV 期盆腔脏器脱垂手术治疗后的长期结局及失败预测因素
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3482-5. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).国际尿控协会（IUGA）/国际尿失禁学会（ICS）关于女性盆腔器官脱垂（POP）术语的联合报告。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):655-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3003-y.
10
An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).国际妇科学协会（IUGA）/国际尿控协会（ICS）关于女性盆腔器官脱垂（POP）术语的联合报告。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):165-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1.
盆腔器官支持研究（POSST）：盆腔器官支持缺陷的分布、临床定义及流行病学状况
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):795-806. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.602.
4
Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).是否正在使用盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（POPQ）？一项针对国际尿控学会（ICS）和美国妇科泌尿学会（AUGS）成员的调查。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Sep-Oct;15(5):324-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1175-3. Epub 2004 May 18.
5
Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature.同行评审文献中盆腔器官脱垂量化系统的应用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1632-5; discussion 1635-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.010.
6
Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse?普通女性人群中症状与盆腔器官支持程度的相关性：什么是盆腔器官脱垂？
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):372-7; discussion 377-9. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00698-7.
7
A PRACTICAL SYSTEM OF DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF PELVIC RELAXATIONS.盆腔松弛的实用诊断与分类系统
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963 Dec;117:769-73.
8
The conflict in nomenclature for descensus uteri.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Apr;81:817-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33537-7.
9
Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results.检查技术改进对盆腔器官脱垂定量（POP-Q）结果的影响。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Jun;14(2):136-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-002-1030-3. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
10
Pelvic floor dysfunction management practice patterns: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association.盆底功能障碍管理实践模式：对国际尿控协会成员的一项调查
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(5):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s001920200069.