• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（S-POP）与标准盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（POPQ）在描述盆腔器官脱垂方面的系统间关联。

The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse.

作者信息

Manonai Jittima, Mouritsen Lone, Palma Paulo, Contreras-Ortiz Oscar, Korte Jeffrey E, Swift Steven

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1286-y. Epub 2010 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-010-1286-y
PMID:20936258
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study is to determine the association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.

METHODS

This was an observational study. The subjects with pelvic floor disorder symptoms underwent two exams: a POPQ exam and a simplified POPQ. To compare with the simplified POPQ, vaginal segments of the POPQ exam were defined using points Ba, Bp, C, and D. Primary outcome was the association between the overall ordinal stages from each exam.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three subjects with mean age of 56 +/- 13 years. Twenty three subjects were status post-hysterectomy. The Kendall's tau-b statistic for overall stage was 0.80, for the anterior vaginal wall the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the posterior vaginal wall segment the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the cervix the Kendall's tau-b was 0.88, for the posterior fornix/vaginal cuff the Kendall's tau-b was 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究的目的是确定盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统（POPQ）与简化版POPQ之间的关联。

方法

这是一项观察性研究。有盆底功能障碍症状的受试者接受了两项检查：一次POPQ检查和一次简化版POPQ检查。为了与简化版POPQ进行比较，POPQ检查的阴道部分使用Ba、Bp、C和D点进行定义。主要结局是每次检查的总体序数分期之间的关联。

结果

143名受试者，平均年龄56±13岁。23名受试者接受过子宫切除手术。总体分期的肯德尔tau-b统计量为0.80，阴道前壁的肯德尔tau-b为0.71，阴道后壁节段的肯德尔tau-b为0.71，宫颈的肯德尔tau-b为0.88，后穹窿/阴道袖口的肯德尔tau-b为0.85。

结论

POPQ与简化版POPQ之间存在显著关联。

相似文献

1
The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse.简化盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（S-POP）与标准盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（POPQ）在描述盆腔器官脱垂方面的系统间关联。
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1286-y. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
2
Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.一种使用POPQ盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的简化技术的验证
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0076-z. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
3
[Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system].[在盆腔器官脱垂分期临床实践中应用简化的盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统：与标准盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统的比较分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 25;51(7):510-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.07.006.
4
Comparative study to evaluate the intersystem association and reliability between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system.评估标准盆腔器官脱垂量化系统与简化盆腔器官脱垂评分系统之间的系统间关联及可靠性的比较研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Dec;64(6):421-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0537-0. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
5
Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):645-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
6
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification use in the literature.盆腔器官脱垂量化在文献中的应用。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):35-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bd1ab.
7
Relation between vaginal birth and pelvic organ prolapse.阴道分娩与盆腔器官脱垂之间的关系。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):200-3. doi: 10.1080/00016340802596033.
8
Quantification of vaginal support: are continuous summary scores better than POPQ stage?阴道支持度的量化评估：连续总结评分是否优于 POPQ 分期？
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):512.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.071. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
9
The recovery of pelvic organ support during the first year postpartum.产后一年内盆腔器官支持的恢复。
BJOG. 2013 Oct;120(11):1430-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12369. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
10
The effect of physical activity on pelvic organ prolapse.体育活动对盆腔器官脱垂的影响。
BJOG. 2009 May;116(6):824-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02112.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse among women in Sidama region, Ethiopia: A community-based survey.埃塞俄比亚锡达玛地区女性盆腔器官脱垂的患病率及相关因素：一项基于社区的调查。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241265078. doi: 10.1177/17455057241265078.
2
Association of the second birth mode of delivery and interval with maternal pelvic floor changes: a prospective cohort study.分娩方式和间隔与产妇盆底变化的关联：一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06366-6.
3
International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals.在选定专业期刊的已发表文章中盆腔器官脱垂分期系统的应用
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):359-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1044-1. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Experiences and expectations of women with urogenital prolapse: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.患有泌尿生殖系统脱垂的女性的经历与期望：一项定量与定性研究
BJOG. 2008 Oct;115(11):1362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01842.x. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
3
Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.
国际尿妇科咨询第二章委员会 3：盆腔器官脱垂的临床评估，包括相关发病率/盆底功能障碍的调查。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2657-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05629-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Modified Oxford technique of colpopexy for the treatment of uterine and vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective pilot cohort study.改良牛津阴道骶骨固定术治疗子宫和阴道穹窿脱垂：一项回顾性试点队列研究
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 30;10:1222950. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1222950. eCollection 2023.
5
Reliability and validity of the Sidaamu Afoo version of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score questionnaire.Sidaamu Afoo 版盆腔器官脱垂症状评分问卷的信度和效度。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02478-x.
6
Delay in seeking treatment and associated factors among women with pelvic organ prolapse in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia: Hospital based mixed method study.沃莱塔地区盆腔器官脱垂女性寻求治疗的延迟及其相关因素：基于医院的混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02346-8.
7
A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Simple Transobturator Midurethal Sling and Posterior Pelvic Floor Reconstruction.单纯经闭孔尿道中段吊带术与后盆腔重建治疗女性压力性尿失禁的临床疗效对比研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 12;59(1):155. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010155.
8
Translation, reliability, and validity of Amharic versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7).阿姆哈拉语版盆腔窘迫量表（PFDI-20）和盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁影响问卷（PFIQ-7）的翻译、信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0270434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270434. eCollection 2022.
9
Prevalence and surgical outcomes of stage 3 and 4 pelvic organs prolapse in Jimma university medical center, south west Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马大学医学中心 3 期和 4 期盆腔器官脱垂的患病率和手术结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Oct 7;22(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01992-8.
10
Comparison of outcomes between pessary use and surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective self-controlled study.比较症状性盆腔器官脱垂使用子宫托和手术治疗的效果：一项前瞻性自身对照研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):214-220. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210395.
一种使用POPQ盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的简化技术的验证
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0076-z. Epub 2006 Apr 6.
4
The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment.盆底功能障碍的隐匿性流行：改善预防与治疗的可实现目标。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1488-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.028.
5
Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).是否正在使用盆腔器官脱垂量化系统（POPQ）？一项针对国际尿控学会（ICS）和美国妇科泌尿学会（AUGS）成员的调查。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Sep-Oct;15(5):324-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1175-3. Epub 2004 May 18.
6
Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature.同行评审文献中盆腔器官脱垂量化系统的应用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1632-5; discussion 1635-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.010.
7
Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women.国际尿控协会、美国妇科泌尿学会和妇科外科医师学会的盆腔器官脱垂分期系统在围绝经期女性中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1324-7; discussion 1327-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70371-6.
8
Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;179(6 Pt 1):1458-63; discussion 1463-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70010-9.
9
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system.国际尿失禁学会、妇科外科医师学会和美国妇科泌尿学会提出的盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的观察者间及观察者内可靠性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1467-70; discussion 1470-1. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1.
10
Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(3):121-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01894199.