Department of Human Genetics and Public Health, Graduate School of Proteomics, The University of Tokushima, Kuramoto-cho, 770-8503, Tokushima, Japan.
Environ Health Prev Med. 2004 Mar;9(2):47-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02897931.
The purpose of the presentin vitro study was to predict to what extent dietary fiber (DF) takes up heterocyclic aromatic amine (HAA) and how DF acts to intercept HAAsin vivo.
The sorption isotherms of 2-amino-3-methyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole acetate (Trp-P-1), and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole acetate (Trp-P-2) for DF were measured in artificial intestinal juice (AIJ) and artificial gastric juice (AGJ) at 37°C. The desorption of HAA from DF was measured in AGJ and AIJ.
The sorption isotherms were statistically classified into four types. The percentage of Trp-Ps taken up by carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) and agar in AGJ (pH, 1.2) was 52-56% and 58-78%, respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of Trp-Ps taken up by CMC and agar in AIJ (pH, 6.8) was 97-98% and 87-89%, respectively. The percentage of IQ and MeIQ sorbed by CMC was 21-27% in AGJ and 100% in AIJ. Collagen and chitin did not remove any HAAs in AGJ, but removed 4-69% in AIJ. In the four-component solution, the percentage of HAA taken up by DF was almost the same or significantly increased, with a few exceptions, as compared with that in the one-component solution.
The results indicated that MeIQ is mainly held on the surface of CMC in AIJ, and that Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 are mainly held in the interior of agar in AGJ and AIJ. The results on sorption-desorptionin vitro indicate that sorbed HAAs in the stomach are held more firmly by agar than by CMC while DF passes through the human intestinal tract. CMC and agar would be expected to be more useful than collagen and chitin as agents intercepting HAAs.
本体外研究的目的是预测膳食纤维(DF)吸收杂环胺(HAA)的程度以及 DF 在体内拦截 HAA 的作用方式。
在 37°C 下,在人工胃液(AGJ)和人工肠液(AIJ)中测量 2-氨基-3-甲基-3H-咪唑[4,5-f]喹啉(IQ)、2-氨基-3,4-二甲基-3H-咪唑[4,5-f]喹啉(MeIQ)、3-氨基-1,4-二甲基-5H-吡啶并[4,3-b]吲哚乙酸盐(Trp-P-1)和 3-氨基-1-甲基-5H-吡啶并[4,3-b]吲哚乙酸盐(Trp-P-2)在 DF 上的吸附等温线。在 AGJ 和 AIJ 中测量 HAA 从 DF 中的解吸。
吸附等温线被统计分类为四种类型。羧甲基纤维素(CMC)和琼脂在 AGJ(pH,1.2)中吸收的 Trp-Ps 百分比分别为 52-56%和 58-78%。另一方面,CMC 和琼脂在 AIJ(pH,6.8)中吸收的 Trp-Ps 百分比分别为 97-98%和 87-89%。在 AGJ 中,CMC 吸附的 IQ 和 MeIQ 百分比为 21-27%,而在 AIJ 中则为 100%。胶原和几丁质在 AGJ 中没有去除任何 HAA,但在 AIJ 中去除了 4-69%。在四组分溶液中,与单一组分溶液相比,DF 吸收 HAA 的百分比几乎相同或显著增加,只有少数例外。
结果表明,MeIQ 主要在 AIJ 中的 CMC 表面被保留,而 Trp-P-1 和 Trp-P-2 主要在 AGJ 和 AIJ 中的琼脂内部被保留。体外吸附-解吸结果表明,DF 通过人体肠道时,在胃中被吸附的 HAA 与 CMC 相比更牢固地被琼脂保留。CMC 和琼脂有望比胶原和几丁质更有用,作为拦截 HAA 的试剂。