Telesnitsky A, Goff SP
Reverse transcription—the reverse or “retro” flow of genetic information from RNA to DNA—is a hallmark of the retroviral replication cycle. The term “retroviruses” has now largely supplanted the earlier designation, “RNA tumor viruses,” recognizing that reverse transcription typifies this class of viruses better than any other property. The suggestion that some RNA viruses might replicate via a DNA intermediate that was subsequently incorporated into the host genome was first made by Howard Temin. By the 1960s, studies of bacteriophage had provided precedents for the integration of viral DNA into the host genome, and thus the most controversial aspect of Temin's proposal was the suggestion that the genome of an RNA virus could be converted into DNA. The stunning finding of an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase or reverse transcriptase (RT)—made independently by Temin and by Baltimore, who looked for and found the activity in purified virions—caught the scientific world off guard. It was then believed that reverse transcription flagrantly violated the central dogma of molecular biology—that genetic information always flowed from DNA to RNA to protein (Baltimore 1970; Temin and Mizutani 1970). The discovery that information could flow from RNA to DNA added considerable weight to Temin's earlier experiments which showed that the replication of retroviruses was sensitive to inhibitors of DNA synthesis. The ability of retroviruses to make a DNA copy of their genome and insert it into the genome of the host explains much of the biology of these viruses: their ability to establish persistent infections and to produce chronically infected cells, and the ability of a subset of retroviruses to transform infected cells rapidly and efficiently. Now, many years later, it is clear that RT is required for the replication of several classes of transposable elements and for certain plant and animal viruses. The AIDS pandemic has invigorated interest in RT because the enzyme plays a central part in retroviral replication and is an important therapeutic target (see Chapter 12. Although it is outside the scope of this chapter, it should be remembered that RT has had a critical role in the development of modern biology: The ability to convert RNA into DNA has been as important to molecular biologists as it has been to retrovirologists. It is worth taking a moment to reflect on how much more difficult it would have been to solve the puzzles posed by the organization and expression of genes in higher eukaryotes if RT did not exist. A number of reviews that focused specifically on RT or include RT as a major theme have recently appeared (see, e.g., Varmus and Brown 1989; Goff 1990; Whitcomb and Hughes 1992; Skalka and Goff 1993). This chapter focuses on an understanding of the process of reverse transcription in the retroviral life cycle and on ways in which the properties of retroviral RT relate to retroviral replication.
逆转录——即遗传信息从RNA到DNA的反向或“逆转”流动——是逆转录病毒复制周期的一个标志。“逆转录病毒”一词如今已在很大程度上取代了早期的称谓“RNA肿瘤病毒”,因为人们认识到逆转录比其他任何特性都更能代表这类病毒的特征。霍华德·特明首次提出,一些RNA病毒可能通过随后整合到宿主基因组中的DNA中间体进行复制。到了20世纪60年代,对噬菌体的研究为病毒DNA整合到宿主基因组中提供了先例,因此特明提议中最具争议的方面是RNA病毒的基因组可以转化为DNA这一观点。特明和巴尔的摩各自独立发现了一种RNA依赖性DNA聚合酶或逆转录酶(RT)——他们在纯化的病毒粒子中寻找并发现了这种活性——这一惊人发现让科学界措手不及。当时人们认为逆转录公然违背了分子生物学的中心法则,即遗传信息总是从DNA流向RNA再流向蛋白质(巴尔的摩,1970年;特明和水谷,1970年)。信息可以从RNA流向DNA这一发现为特明早期的实验增添了相当多的分量,这些实验表明逆转录病毒的复制对DNA合成抑制剂敏感。逆转录病毒能够将其基因组复制成DNA并插入宿主基因组,这解释了这类病毒的许多生物学特性:它们建立持续感染和产生慢性感染细胞的能力,以及一部分逆转录病毒快速有效地转化感染细胞的能力。如今,多年过去了,很明显RT是几类转座元件以及某些植物和动物病毒复制所必需的。艾滋病的流行激发了人们对RT的兴趣,因为这种酶在逆转录病毒复制中起核心作用,并且是一个重要的治疗靶点(见第12章)。虽然这超出了本章的范围,但应该记住,RT在现代生物学的发展中发挥了关键作用:将RNA转化为DNA的能力对分子生物学家和逆转录病毒学家同样重要。值得花点时间思考一下,如果没有RT,解决高等真核生物中基因的组织和表达所带来的难题将会困难多少。最近出现了一些专门关注RT或以RT为主要主题的综述(例如,见瓦尔默斯和布朗,1989年;戈夫,1990年;惠特科姆和休斯,1992年;斯卡尔卡和戈夫,1993年)。本章重点在于理解逆转录病毒生命周期中的逆转录过程,以及逆转录病毒RT的特性与逆转录病毒复制的关系。