Suppr超能文献

美金刚与丁丙诺啡用于纳洛酮诱发海洛因成瘾者急性戒断反应的双盲、双模拟、随机对照研究

A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled study of memantine versus buprenorphine in naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal in heroin addicts.

作者信息

Jain Kushal, Jain Raka, Dhawan Anju

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Opioid Manag. 2011 Jan-Feb;7(1):11-20. doi: 10.5055/jom.2011.0044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of memantine with buprenorphine in the suppression of naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal in heroin-dependent male subjects in an inpatient setting.

SETTING

Inpatient unit of tertiary level deaddiction facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five treatment-seeking heroin-dependent males.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects stabilized on 650 mg of dextropropoxyphene for 5 days were randomly divided into two groups on the sixth day: group A (n=25) received 20 mg of memantine with buprenorphineplacebo, and group B (n=20) received 2 mg of buprenorphine with memantine placebo. Acute withdrawals were precipitated with naloxone (0.4 mg, intravenously) and were assessed using subjective and objective opioid withdrawal scales (SOWS and OOWS) and two separate visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain and dysphoria at baseline prior to test drug administration and again after the precipitation of acute withdrawal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity ofprecipitated opioid withdrawals.

RESULTS

Baseline opioid withdrawal symptoms in both groups did not differ significantly. After the precipitation of acute withdrawal, there were no significant differences between subjects in both groups on OOWS and both VASs but showed significant difference on SOWS. When changes in ratings from baseline (and after naloxone-precipitated acute withdrawal) were compared between the two groups, a significant difference in the change in SOWS scores was observed with greater decrease in withdrawal scores in the buprenorphine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Memantine has comparable efficacy to buprenorphine in the suppression of objective signs of naloxone-precipitated acute opioid withdrawal; however, its role in the suppression of subjective symptoms is debatable.

摘要

目的

比较美金刚与丁丙诺啡在住院环境中抑制海洛因依赖男性受试者纳洛酮诱发的急性戒断反应的疗效。

设置

三级戒毒机构的住院部。

参与者

45名寻求治疗的海洛因依赖男性。

干预措施

在650毫克右丙氧芬上稳定5天的受试者在第6天被随机分为两组:A组(n = 25)接受20毫克美金刚加丁丙诺啡安慰剂,B组(n = 20)接受2毫克丁丙诺啡加美金刚安慰剂。用纳洛酮(0.4毫克,静脉注射)诱发急性戒断反应,并在给药前基线时以及急性戒断反应诱发后,使用主观和客观阿片类戒断量表(SOWS和OOWS)以及两个单独的视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛和烦躁进行评估。

主要观察指标

诱发的阿片类戒断反应的严重程度。

结果

两组的基线阿片类戒断症状无显著差异。急性戒断反应诱发后,两组受试者在OOWS和两个VAS上均无显著差异,但在SOWS上有显著差异。当比较两组从基线(以及纳洛酮诱发急性戒断反应后)的评分变化时,观察到SOWS评分变化有显著差异,丁丙诺啡组的戒断评分下降幅度更大。

结论

在抑制纳洛酮诱发的急性阿片类戒断反应的客观体征方面,美金刚与丁丙诺啡疗效相当;然而,其在抑制主观症状方面的作用存在争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验