Rosado James, Walsh Sharon L, Bigelow George E, Strain Eric C
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5510 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Oct 8;90(2-3):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 May 22.
Acute doses of buprenorphine can precipitate withdrawal in opioid dependent persons. The likelihood of this withdrawal increases as a function of the level of physical dependence.
To test the acute effects of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in volunteers with a higher level of physical dependence. The goal was to identify a dose that would precipitate withdrawal (Phase 1), then determine if withdrawal could be attenuated by splitting this dose (Phase 2).
Residential laboratory study; subjects (N=16) maintained on 100mg per day of methadone. Phase 1: randomized, double blind, triple dummy, within subject study. Conditions were sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (4/1, 8/2, 16/4, 32mg/8mg), intramuscular naloxone (0.2mg), oral methadone (100mg), or placebo. Medication conditions were randomized, but buprenorphine/naloxone doses were ascending within the randomization. Phase 2: Conditions were methadone, placebo, naloxone, 100% of the buprenorphine/naloxone dose that precipitated withdrawal in Phase 1 (full dose), and 50% of this dose administered twice in a session (split dose). Analyses covaried by trough methadone serum levels.
Six subjects did not complete the study. Of the 10 who completed, 3 tolerated up to 32mg/8mg of buprenorphine/naloxone without evidence of precipitated withdrawal. For the seven completing both phases, split doses generally produced less precipitated withdrawal compared to full doses.
There is considerable between subject variability in sensitivity to buprenorphine's antagonist effects. Low, repeated doses of buprenorphine/naloxone (e.g., 2mg/0.5mg) may be an effective mechanism for safely dosing this medication in persons with higher levels of physical dependence.
阿片类药物依赖者服用急性剂量的丁丙诺啡可引发戒断反应。这种戒断反应的可能性会随着身体依赖程度的增加而上升。
测试舌下含服丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮片对身体依赖程度较高的志愿者的急性影响。目标是确定一个能引发戒断反应的剂量(第1阶段),然后确定将该剂量分开服用是否能减轻戒断反应(第2阶段)。
住院实验室研究;受试者(N = 16)每天维持服用100毫克美沙酮。第1阶段:随机、双盲、三模拟、受试者内研究。条件包括舌下含服丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(4/1、8/2、16/4、32毫克/8毫克)、肌肉注射纳洛酮(0.2毫克)、口服美沙酮(100毫克)或安慰剂。药物条件是随机的,但丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮剂量在随机分组内是递增的。第2阶段:条件包括美沙酮、安慰剂、纳洛酮、第1阶段引发戒断反应的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮剂量的100%(全剂量),以及在一个疗程中两次服用该剂量的50%(分开剂量)。分析根据美沙酮血清谷浓度进行协变量调整。
6名受试者未完成研究。在完成研究的10名受试者中,3名耐受高达32毫克/8毫克的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮,无引发戒断反应的证据。对于完成两个阶段的7名受试者,与全剂量相比,分开剂量通常引发的戒断反应较少。
个体对丁丙诺啡拮抗作用的敏感性存在相当大的差异。低剂量、重复服用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(例如2毫克/0.5毫克)可能是在身体依赖程度较高的人群中安全给药的有效机制。