• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本奈良队列研究中根治性前列腺切除术后基于风险分层的生存率和生化复发预测因素。

Risk-stratified survival rates and predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in a Nara, Japan, cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;16(5):553-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0226-2. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-011-0226-2
PMID:21437569
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in various risk groups.

METHODS

The subjects were 468 patients with clinically localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-3N0M0) who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy with/without neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy at Nara Medical University and its affiliated hospitals between January 1997 and December 2006. All patients were stratified by D'Amico risk classification. The independent predictor of biochemical recurrence was determined in each risk group.

RESULTS

Of all 468 patients, 171 patients showed biochemical recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 53 months. The 5-year estimated biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were 77.3, 71.3, and 46.3%, respectively. The multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model showed that patient age in the low-risk group, seminal vesicle involvement in the intermediate-risk group, and prostate-specific antigen value at diagnosis, surgical Gleason score, percent positive core, and perineural invasion in the high-risk group were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-risk patients showed a significant higher biochemical recurrence than the low- and intermediate-risk patients. The independent predictor of biochemical recurrence was different in each risk group.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在不同风险组接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者的肿瘤学结果。

方法

本研究对象为 468 例经奈良医科大学及其附属医院于 1997 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月间接受经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术加/或新辅助和/或辅助治疗的局限性或局部进展性前列腺腺癌(T1-3N0M0)的临床患者。所有患者均按 D'Amico 风险分类分层。在每个风险组中确定生化复发的独立预测因子。

结果

在所有 468 例患者中,有 171 例患者在平均随访 53 个月期间出现生化复发。低、中、高危组的 5 年生化无复发生存率分别为 77.3%、71.3%和 46.3%。使用 Cox 比例风险模型的多变量分析显示,低危组患者年龄、中危组精囊侵犯、高危组前列腺特异性抗原值、手术 Gleason 评分、阳性核心百分比和神经周围侵犯是生化复发的独立预测因子。

结论

高危患者的生化复发率明显高于低危和中危患者。生化复发的独立预测因子在每个风险组中均不同。

相似文献

1
Risk-stratified survival rates and predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in a Nara, Japan, cohort study.日本奈良队列研究中根治性前列腺切除术后基于风险分层的生存率和生化复发预测因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;16(5):553-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0226-2. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
2
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的预测:784例日本患者的分析
Int J Urol. 2015 Feb;22(2):188-93. doi: 10.1111/iju.12624. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的预测因素:359例患者分析,中位随访期26个月
Int J Urol. 2018 Dec;25(12):1006-1014. doi: 10.1111/iju.13808. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.对采用根治性前列腺切除术治疗的达米科中度风险前列腺癌生化复发危险因素的重新评估。
Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Stratification of patient risk based on prostate-specific antigen doubling time after radical retropubic prostatectomy.基于耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间对患者风险进行分层。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Apr;82(4):422-7. doi: 10.4065/82.4.422.
7
A contemporary analysis of outcomes of adenocarcinoma of the prostate with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后伴精囊侵犯(pT3b)的前列腺腺癌患者的当代结局分析。
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.059. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
8
Evaluation of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy by cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score.通过前列腺癌术后风险评估(CAPRA-S)评分评估根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存率。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2527-30. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2527.
9
Role of microvessel density in predicting recurrence in pathologic Stage T3 prostatic adenocarcinoma.微血管密度在预测病理分期为T3期前列腺腺癌复发中的作用。
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):479-85. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00202-2.
10
High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.在根治性前列腺切除术后,切缘阳性的高级别 Gleason 分级癌预示着生化失败,并且可能指导辅助放疗。
BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world comparative outcomes and toxicities after definitive radiotherapy using proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a retrospective, single-institutional analysis.质子束治疗与调强放射治疗用于前列腺癌根治性放疗后的真实世界比较结局和毒性:一项回顾性单机构分析
J Radiat Res. 2025 Jan 22;66(1):39-51. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae065.
2
The impact of the definition of biochemical recurrence following salvage radiotherapy on outcomes and prognostication in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a comparative study of three definitions.挽救性放疗后生化复发的定义对前列腺癌根治术后复发性前列腺癌患者的结局和预后的影响:三种定义的比较研究
Prostate Int. 2019 Jun;7(2):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends of the primary therapy for patients with prostate cancer in Nara uro-oncological research group (NUORG): a comparison between the CaPSURE data and the NUORG data.奈良泌尿肿瘤研究组(NUORG)中前列腺癌患者的主要治疗趋势:CaPSURE 数据与 NUORG 数据的比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;40(6):588-92. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq008. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
2
Natural history of clinically staged low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with monotherapeutic permanent interstitial brachytherapy.经单药治疗的临床分期低危和中危前列腺癌的自然史:永久性间质近距离放射治疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Feb 1;76(2):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 May 19.
3
Predictive factors for short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者短期生化无复发生存的预测因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1099-1104. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01445-7. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
4
Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer.神经周围浸润与致命性前列腺癌风险
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 May;26(5):719-726. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0237. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after local treatment: a meta-analysis.神经周围浸润是局部治疗后前列腺癌生化复发的独立预测因素:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13267-74. eCollection 2015.
6
Significance of preoperative butyrylcholinesterase as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.术前丁酰胆碱酯酶作为接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者生化无复发生存独立预测指标的意义。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;21(2):379-383. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0880-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists.泌尿外科病理学家的复审提高了普通病理学家进行 Gleason 分级的准确性。
BMC Urol. 2015 Jul 23;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0066-x.
8
Risk factors of PSA progression and overall survival in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy.接受初始雄激素剥夺治疗的局限性和局部晚期前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原进展及总生存的危险因素
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 20;15:420. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1429-0.
9
Focal Cryotherapy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Are We Treating the Cancer or the Mind? - The Cancer.低风险前列腺癌的聚焦冷冻疗法:我们是在治疗癌症还是心理?——癌症
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jan-Feb;41(1):5-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.02.
10
Factors effective on survival after radical prostatectomy: To what extent is pre-operative biopsy Gleason scoring is confident in predicting the prognosis?根治性前列腺切除术后影响生存的因素:术前活检 Gleason 评分在预测预后方面的可信度如何?
Urol Ann. 2015 Apr-Jun;7(2):159-65. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.150527.
Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
使用2005年国际泌尿病理学会关于Gleason分级的共识,对日本临床局限性前列腺癌患者进行Partin表验证及术前列线图的开发:来自局限性前列腺癌临床病理研究组的数据
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.047. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
4
Mayo Clinic validation of the D'amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy.梅奥诊所对用于预测根治性前列腺切除术后生存率的达米科风险组分类法的验证。
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1354-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.061. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
5
Contemporary evaluation of the D'amico risk classification of prostate cancer.前列腺癌达米科风险分类的当代评估。
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):931-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.055.
6
Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer.MD安德森前列腺癌随机剂量递增试验的长期结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
7
Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.系统六分区活检中阳性癌芯的百分比、癌灶长度以及Gleason 4/5级癌均能预测根治性前列腺切除术后的不良病理结果和生化复发。
Int J Urol. 2007 Aug;14(8):713-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01809.x.
8
Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment.低风险前列腺癌的当代趋势:风险评估与治疗
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 2):S14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.135. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
9
Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.基于2000年至2005年的病例,更新了列线图,以根据前列腺特异性抗原水平、临床分期和活检Gleason评分(Partin表)预测前列腺癌的病理分期。
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042.
10
Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.对阳性活检核心的数量和百分比预测根治性前列腺切除术后病理分期和生化复发能力的系统评估。
Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):733-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.054. Epub 2007 Mar 6.