• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of the interaction of mono- and oligovalent ligands with cholera toxin. Demonstration of aggregate formation at low ligand concentrations.

作者信息

Schwarzmann G, Mraz W, Sattler J, Schindler R, Wiegandt H

出版信息

Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1978 Oct;359(10):1277-86. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1978.359.2.1277.

DOI:10.1515/bchm2.1978.359.2.1277
PMID:214384
Abstract

The stimulation by cholera toxin of adenylate cyclase in Chinese hamster ovarian cells could be inhibited by various ligands. The latter have been shown to contain the structural oligosaccharide entities required for binding to cholera toxin, established as Galbeta1 leads to 3GalNAcbeta1 leads to 4Gal3 comes from 2alphaNeuAc. The different inhibitory potency of the ligands thereby correlates with the size of the aggregates formed with the toxin, which in turn depends on the valency of the ligands. The conclusion is drawn from a comparison of the interaction of cholera toxin and its B-protomer with ganglioside II3NeuAc-GgOse4-Cer, the newly synthesized bis-(monosialo-gangliotetraityl)amine and monosialogangliotetraose. In a double diffusion test cholera toxin B-protomer precipitated with the ganglioside II3 NeuAcGgOSE4-Cer and the divalent ligand bis(monosialo-gangliotetraityl)amine, suggesting the formation of high molecular weight aggregates, whereas no precipitation was observed with the monovalent monosialo-gangliotetraose. By ultracentrifugation analysis, aggregate formation of the cholera toxin B-protomer could be demonstrated with the ganglioside II3 NeuAc-GgOse4-Cer and bis(monosialo-gangliotetraityl)amine at a concentration at which the ganglioside was assumed to be monodisperse. Ganglioside/cholera toxin B-protomer complexes sediment faster than those of the toxin and bis(monosialo-gangliotetraityl)amine, suggesting higher aggregation of cholera toxin B-protomer with the former. On the other hand, no sedimentation with monosialo-gangliotetraose was observed. By equilibrium displacement dialysis, however, a comparable high affinity of binding to cholera toxin B-protomer of both the mono- and divalent oligosaccharides was demonstrated. Furthermore, values for the maximal concentration of the bound ligand from these binding experiments with cholera toxin B-protomer established molar ratios of ligand to protein of 4 to 1 and 2 to 1 for monosialo-gangliotetraose and bis(monosialo-gangliotetraityl)amine, respectively. From the results it is concluded that the lipophilic moiety of the ganglioside is not directly involved in the binding process to the toxin protein but leads to an oligovalency of this ligand, due to formation of micellar or submicellar structures.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of the interaction of mono- and oligovalent ligands with cholera toxin. Demonstration of aggregate formation at low ligand concentrations.
Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1978 Oct;359(10):1277-86. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1978.359.2.1277.
2
Studies of ligand binding to cholera toxin, III. Cooperativity of oligosaccharide binding.霍乱毒素配体结合的研究,III. 寡糖结合的协同性。
Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1978 Jun;359(6):719-23. doi: 10.1515/bchm.1978.359.1.719.
3
Studies of the ligand binding to cholera toxin, II. The hydrophilic moiety of sialoglycolipids.
Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1977 Feb;358(2):159-63. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1977.358.1.159.
4
Interaction of cholera toxin with gangliosides: differential effects of the oligosaccharide of ganglioside GM1 and of micellar gangliosides.霍乱毒素与神经节苷脂的相互作用:神经节苷脂GM1的寡糖和胶束状神经节苷脂的不同作用
Biochemistry. 1984 May 22;23(11):2520-6. doi: 10.1021/bi00306a031.
5
Studies of the ligand binding to cholera toxin, I. The lipophilic moiety of sialoglycolipids.
Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1976 Nov;357(11):1637-46. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1976.357.2.1637.
6
Mechanism of action of cholera toxin: effect of receptor density and multivalent binding on activation of adenylate cyclase.霍乱毒素的作用机制:受体密度和多价结合对腺苷酸环化酶激活的影响。
J Membr Biol. 1980;54(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01875376.
7
Structure-function studies of cholera toxin and its A and B protomers. Modification of tryptophan residues.霍乱毒素及其A和B亚基的结构-功能研究。色氨酸残基的修饰。
J Biol Chem. 1981 Jun 10;256(11):5481-8.
8
Generation of cell surface neoganglioproteins. GM1-neoganglioproteins are non-functional receptors for cholera toxin.细胞表面新神经节苷脂蛋白的生成。GM1-新神经节苷脂蛋白是霍乱毒素的无功能受体。
J Biol Chem. 1990 May 5;265(13):7673-8.
9
Regulation by butyrate of the cAMP response to cholera toxin and forskolin in pituitary GH1 cells.丁酸对垂体GH1细胞中cAMP对霍乱毒素和福斯高林反应的调节作用。
Eur J Biochem. 1990 Feb 14;187(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15354.x.
10
Cholera toxin and membrane gangliosides: binding and adenylate cyclase activation in normal and transformed cells.霍乱毒素与膜神经节苷脂:正常细胞和转化细胞中的结合及腺苷酸环化酶激活
J Membr Biol. 1978 Jul 21;42(1):61-79. doi: 10.1007/BF01870394.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycosphingolipids-sweets for botulinum neurotoxin.糖鞘脂——肉毒杆菌神经毒素的“甜蜜陷阱”
Glycoconj J. 2004;21(6):287-93. doi: 10.1023/B:GLYC.0000046271.64647.fd.
2
Oligosaccharide-derivatized dendrimers: defined multivalent inhibitors of the adherence of the cholera toxin B subunit and the heat labile enterotoxin of E. coli to GM1.寡糖衍生化树枝状大分子:霍乱毒素B亚基及大肠杆菌热不稳定肠毒素与GM1结合的特定多价抑制剂
Glycoconj J. 1997 Nov;14(7):837-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1018590021762.
3
Characterization of the cholera toxin receptor on Balb/c 3T3 cells as a ganglioside similar to, or identical with, ganglioside GM1. No evidence for galactoproteins with receptor activity.
将Balb/c 3T3细胞上的霍乱毒素受体鉴定为一种与神经节苷脂GM1相似或相同的神经节苷脂。没有证据表明存在具有受体活性的半乳糖蛋白。
Biochem J. 1982 Apr 15;204(1):209-19. doi: 10.1042/bj2040209.
4
Role of membrane gangliosides in the binding and action of bacterial toxins.膜神经节苷脂在细菌毒素结合及作用中的作用。
J Membr Biol. 1982;69(2):85-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01872268.