Orthopedic Department, Caen University Hospital, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.003.
To determine six-degree of freedom of total knee arthroplasty kinematics (TKA), optimized matching algorithms for single fluoroscopic image system may be used. Theoretical accuracy of these systems was reported. Nevertheless, all reports were done under idealized laboratory experimental conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the "true" accuracy of a flat panel single plane video-fluoroscopy system based on computed-assisted design (CAD) model matching and compare it to TKA kinematics obtained from optoelectronic measurements as gold standard.
The estimation of the error produced by 2D/3D fluoroscopic registration in daily practice is misjudged in most available laboratory reports.
The experimental set-up used a TKA implanted into femoral and tibial cadaver bones. Thirty flexions were simultaneously registered using single plane fluoroscopy and an active optical tracking system. Kinematics registered were compared using the root mean square error (RMS), the concordance correlation coefficient and Bland & Altman plot analysis.
The mean range of motion of flexion during the experiment was 106°. The respective RMS for flexion, varus-valgus and internal-external rotation were 0.68, 0.67 and 1.02°. The respective RMS for antero-posterior, medio-lateral and proximo-distal displacement were 1.3, 2.4 and 1.06 mm. Extreme values of the measured error concerning medio-lateral displacement were -5.4 and 22,1mm.
Analysis found some outliners in all degree of freedom with a systematic error and larger standard deviation than already published data. One should make sure that during the experiment the motion of interest is in the in-plane direction. Moreover, this study brings out the true threshold detection of this type of analysis.
为了确定全膝关节置换术(TKA)的六自由度运动学,可能需要使用优化的单透视图像系统匹配算法。这些系统的理论精度已经有报道。然而,所有的报告都是在理想化的实验室实验条件下完成的。本研究的目的是评估基于计算机辅助设计(CAD)模型匹配的平板单平面视频透视系统的“真实”精度,并将其与光电测量获得的 TKA 运动学进行比较,作为金标准。
在大多数可用的实验室报告中,对 2D/3D 透视配准产生的误差的估计是错误的。
实验装置使用植入股骨和胫骨尸体骨的 TKA。使用单平面透视和主动光学跟踪系统同时记录 30 次屈曲。使用均方根误差(RMS)、一致性相关系数和 Bland & Altman 图分析比较登记的运动学。
实验过程中屈曲运动的平均活动范围为 106°。屈曲、内翻-外翻和内外旋转的 RMS 分别为 0.68、0.67 和 1.02°。前-后、内-外侧和近-远侧位移的 RMS 分别为 1.3、2.4 和 1.06mm。中-外侧位移测量误差的极值为-5.4 和 22.1mm。
分析发现,在所有自由度中都存在系统误差和大于已发表数据的标准偏差的离群值。在实验过程中,应该确保感兴趣的运动是在平面内方向。此外,本研究揭示了这种类型分析的真实阈值检测。