Suppr超能文献

单平面透视在确定全膝关节置换组件的相对位置和方向中的准确性。

Accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy in determining relative position and orientation of total knee replacement components.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6, Canada.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2011 Feb 24;44(4):784-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.033. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

Abstract

The accuracy of estimating the relative pose between knee replacement components, in terms of clinical motion, is important in the study of knee joint kinematics. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the single-plane fluoroscopy method in calculating the relative pose between the femoral component and the tibial component, along knee motion axes, while the components were in motion relative to one another. The kinematics of total knee replacement components were determined in vitro using two simultaneous methods: single-plane fluoroscopic shape matching and an optoelectronic motion tracking system. The largest mean differences in relative pose between the two methods for any testing condition were 2.1°, 0.3°, and 1.1° in extension, abduction, and internal rotation respectively, and 1.3, 0.9, and 1.9 mm in anterior, distal, and lateral translations, respectively. For the optimized position of the components during dynamic trials, the limits of agreement, between which 95% of differences can be expected to fall, were -2.9 to 4.5° in flexion, -0.9 to 1.5° in abduction, -2.4 to 2.1° in external rotation, -2.0 to 3.9 mm in anterior-posterior translation, -2.2 to 0.4mm in distal-proximal translation and -7.2 to 8.6mm in medial-lateral translation. These mean accuracy values and limits of agreement can be used to determine whether the shape-matching approach using single-plane fluoroscopic images is sufficiently accurate for an intended motion tracking application.

摘要

在研究膝关节运动学中,准确估计膝关节置换组件的相对位置(就临床运动而言)非常重要。本研究的目的是确定单平面透视法在计算股骨组件和胫骨组件之间的相对位置时的准确性,同时组件相对于彼此运动。使用两种同时方法在体外确定全膝关节置换组件的运动学:单平面透视形状匹配和光电运动跟踪系统。在任何测试条件下,两种方法之间相对位置的最大平均差异分别为伸展、外展和内旋时的 2.1°、0.3°和 1.1°,以及前、远和侧平移时的 1.3、0.9 和 1.9mm。对于动态试验中组件的优化位置,95%的差异预计在其中的协议界限为 -2.9 至 4.5°在屈曲、-0.9 至 1.5°在外展、-2.4 至 2.1°在外旋、-2.0 至 3.9mm在前-后平移、-2.2 至 0.4mm在远-近平移和-7.2 至 8.6mm在内外平移。这些平均精度值和协议界限可用于确定使用单平面透视图像的形状匹配方法对于预期的运动跟踪应用是否足够准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验