Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, Exeter, UK Division of Standard Research, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Pain. 2011 Apr;152(4):755-764. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.004.
Acupuncture is commonly used for pain control, but doubts about its effectiveness and safety remain. This review was aimed at critically evaluating systematic reviews of acupuncture as a treatment of pain and at summarizing reports of serious adverse effects published since 2000. Literature searches were carried out in 11 databases without language restrictions. Systematic reviews were considered for the evaluation of effectiveness and case series or case reports for summarizing adverse events. Data were extracted according to predefined criteria. Fifty-seven systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Four were of excellent methodological quality. Numerous contradictions and caveats emerged. Unanimously positive conclusions from more than one high-quality systematic review existed only for neck pain. Ninety-five cases of severe adverse effects including 5 fatalities were included. Pneumothorax and infections were the most frequently reported adverse effects. In conclusion, numerous systematic reviews have generated little truly convincing evidence that acupuncture is effective in reducing pain. Serious adverse effects continue to be reported. Numerous reviews have produced little convincing evidence that acupuncture is effective in reducing pain. Serious adverse events, including deaths, continue to be reported.
针刺通常用于止痛,但对其疗效和安全性仍存在疑问。本综述旨在批判性评估针刺作为疼痛治疗的系统评价,并总结 2000 年以来发表的严重不良事件报告。文献检索在 11 个数据库中进行,无语言限制。系统评价被用于评估疗效,病例系列或病例报告用于总结不良事件。根据预设标准提取数据。57 项系统评价符合纳入标准。其中 4 项具有极好的方法学质量。大量存在矛盾和警告。只有一项高质量的系统评价得出一致的积极结论,即针刺对颈痛有效。共纳入 95 例严重不良事件,包括 5 例死亡。气胸和感染是最常报告的不良事件。总之,大量系统评价并未提供真正令人信服的证据表明针刺能有效减轻疼痛。严重不良事件仍在报告中。