• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How reliable is your hospital? A qualitative framework for analysing reliability levels.

作者信息

Ikkersheim David E, Berg Marc

机构信息

Plexus, Straatweg 68, Breukelen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Sep;20(9):785-790. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045187. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045187
PMID:21441603
Abstract

Objective Many approaches and methods have been developed to reduce errors in the healthcare delivery process and to increase patient safety. One of the approaches suited to improve patient safety is reliability theory. This paper adds a qualitative dimension to the application of reliability theory in hospitals. Based on a review of the literature, the authors identified a framework of qualitative elements that can be used to diagnose, understand and thereby improve upon the level of reliability in (department of) a hospital. Results Based on the literature search, the authors identified four interconnected elements that are crucial for hospital reliability. These four elements are: process optimisation and standardisation; outcome measurement and monitoring; responsibilities and accountability of medical professionals; and organisational culture. Discussion Substantial effort has been made in the last decade to improve patient safety. The actual improvement in safety has been fairly modest, which is understandable because most hospitals currently have fairly unreliable processes in place. Using the framework presented here, hospitals can gauge the reliability of their processes and practices. Recognisable characteristics provide insights into where improvement is needed and possible. In addition, this framework provides a way to view the relationship between different patient safety building blocks and a means to link them conceptually. An integrated approach is needed for hospitals to achieve a higher reliability level with particular attention to the interconnected elements that affect patient safety.

摘要

相似文献

1
How reliable is your hospital? A qualitative framework for analysing reliability levels.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Sep;20(9):785-790. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045187. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
2
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
3
Improving patient safety culture.改善患者安全文化。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(5):489-506. doi: 10.1108/09526861011050529.
4
Reliable implementation of evidence: a qualitative study of antenatal corticosteroid administration in Ohio hospitals.可靠实施证据:俄亥俄州医院产前皮质类固醇治疗的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):173-81. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003984. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
5
Evidence Based Design and healthcare: an unconventional approach to hospital design.循证设计与医疗保健:一种非传统的医院设计方法。
Ann Ig. 2014 Mar-Apr;26(2):137-43. doi: 10.7416/ai.2014.1968.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
Patient safety culture in primary care: developing a theoretical framework for practical use.基层医疗中的患者安全文化:构建一个供实际应用的理论框架。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):313-20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018366.
8
Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care.病例记录回顾方法比较,用于评估医疗保健的质量和安全。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(10):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta14100.
9
Analysing the "field" of patient safety employing Bourdieusian technologies.运用布迪厄理论分析患者安全“场域”。
J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(6):597-609. doi: 10.1108/14777260911001626.
10
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and Satisfaction in Health Care: A Case Study of Two Public Hospitals in Trujillo, Peru.医疗保健中的质量与满意度:秘鲁特鲁希略市两家公立医院的案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;22(7):1119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071119.
2
How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.如何构建可付诸行动的知识库:“最佳匹配”框架综合法在医疗保健改进研究中的作用
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003642. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
3
Improving the quality of emergency medicine care by developing a quality requirement framework: a study from The Netherlands.
通过制定质量要求框架提高急诊医疗服务质量:一项来自荷兰的研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2012 May 23;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-20.
4
Mortality and morbidity meetings: an untapped resource for improving the governance of patient safety?死亡和发病会议:改善患者安全治理的未开发资源?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):576-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000603. Epub 2012 May 3.