Hellings Johan, Schrooten Ward, Klazinga Niek S, Vleugels Arthur
Hospital East Limburg and University Hasselt, Genk, Belgium.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(5):489-506. doi: 10.1108/09526861011050529.
Improving hospital patient safety means an open and stimulating culture is needed. This article aims to describe a patient safety culture improvement approach in five Belgian hospitals.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Patient safety culture was measured using a validated Belgian adaptation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) questionnaire. Studies before (autumn 2005) and after (spring 2007) the improvement approach was implemented were completed. Using HSOPSC, safety culture was measured using 12 dimensions. Results are presented as evolving dimension scores.
Overall, 3,940 and 3,626 individuals responded respectively to the first and second surveys (overall response rate was 77 and 68 percent respectively). After an 18 to 26 month period, significant improvement was observed for the "hospital management support for patient safety" dimension--all main effects were found to be significant. Regression analysis suggests there is a significant difference between professional subgroups. In one hospital the "supervisor expectations and actions promoting safety" improved. The dimension "teamwork within hospital units" received the highest scores in both surveys. There was no improvement and sometimes declining scores in the lowest scoring dimensions: "hospital transfers and transitions", "non-punitive response to error", and "staffing".
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The five participating hospitals were not randomly selected and therefore no representative conclusions can be made for the Belgian hospital sector as a whole. Only a quantitative approach to measuring safety culture was used. Qualitative approaches, focussing on specific safety cultures in specific parts of the participating hospitals, were not used.
Although much needs to be done on the road towards better hospital patient safety, the study presents lessons from various perspectives. It illustrates that hospital staff are highly motivated to participate in measuring patient safety culture. Safety domains that urgently need improvement in these hospitals are identified: hospital transfers and transitions; non-punitive response to error; and staffing. It confirms that realising progress in patient safety culture, demonstrating at the same time that it is possible to improve management support, is complex.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Safety is an important service quality aspect. By measuring safety culture in hospitals, with a validated questionnaire, dimensions that need improvement were revealed thereby contributing to an enhancement plan.
改善医院患者安全意味着需要一种开放且具有激励性的文化氛围。本文旨在描述比利时五家医院的患者安全文化改进方法。
设计/方法/途径:采用经过验证的比利时版《医院患者安全文化调查》(HSOPSC)问卷来衡量患者安全文化。完成了改进方法实施前(2005年秋季)和实施后(2007年春季)的研究。使用HSOPSC,从12个维度对安全文化进行衡量。结果以各维度得分的变化情况呈现。
总体而言,分别有3940人和3626人回应了第一次和第二次调查(总体回应率分别为77%和68%)。经过18至26个月的时间,“医院管理层对患者安全的支持”维度有显著改善——所有主要影响均被发现具有显著性。回归分析表明专业亚组之间存在显著差异。在一家医院,“主管对促进安全的期望和行动”有所改善。“医院各科室内部的团队合作”维度在两次调查中得分最高。得分最低的维度没有改善,有时甚至得分下降:“医院转接与过渡”“对差错的无惩罚性回应”以及“人员配备”。
研究局限性/启示:参与研究的五家医院并非随机选取,因此无法得出关于整个比利时医院行业的代表性结论。仅采用了定量方法来衡量安全文化。未使用定性方法,未聚焦于参与医院特定部门的特定安全文化。
尽管在实现更好的医院患者安全方面仍有许多工作要做,但该研究从多个角度提供了经验教训。它表明医院工作人员非常愿意参与患者安全文化的衡量。确定了这些医院迫切需要改进的安全领域:医院转接与过渡;对差错的无惩罚性回应;以及人员配备。它证实了在患者安全文化方面取得进展,同时证明有可能改善管理层的支持,是复杂的。
原创性/价值:安全是服务质量的一个重要方面。通过使用经过验证的问卷来衡量医院的安全文化,揭示了需要改进的维度,从而有助于制定改进计划。