• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.空间和时间上的分离无法抵消视觉搜索中低患病率的影响。
Vis cogn. 2010 Jun 1;18(6):881-897. doi: 10.1080/13506280903361988.
2
Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.即使在可纠正的搜索中,某些类型的罕见目标也经常被遗漏。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):541-53. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.541.
3
Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search.低患病率视觉搜索中的颜色和空间线索提示
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(7):1327-44. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656662. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.在偶发发现问题的实验室模拟情境中,视觉搜索错误持续存在。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Jul 29;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00235-4.
5
Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.我们为何会错过罕见目标?探索低患病率效应的边界。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 24;8(15):15.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.15.15.
6
Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.变化的目标出现频率揭示了视觉搜索中两种可分离的决策标准。
Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
7
The optimal use of computer aided detection to find low prevalence cancers.利用计算机辅助检测寻找低患病率癌症的最佳方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00361-1.
8
Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?视觉搜索中的错误:是随机的还是确定的?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 19;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z.
9
Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.新培训的机场安检员中的患病率效应:训练有素的观察者也会错过罕见目标。
J Vis. 2013 Dec 2;13(3):33. doi: 10.1167/13.3.33.
10
Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search?预览一个刺激特征是否有助于联合搜索?
Perception. 2004;33(2):195-216. doi: 10.1068/p5162.

引用本文的文献

1
The message matters: changes to binary Computer Aided Detection recommendations affect cancer detection in low prevalence search.信息很重要:二进制计算机辅助检测建议的改变会影响低患病率搜索中的癌症检测。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Sep 2;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00576-4.
2
Framing the fallibility of Computer-Aided Detection aids cancer detection.计算机辅助检测的缺陷性分析有助于癌症检测。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 24;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00485-y.
3
The low prevalence effect in fingerprint comparison amongst forensic science trainees and novices.指纹比对中低出现率效应在法庭科学学员和新手之间的体现。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272338. eCollection 2022.
4
Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See.正常盲视:当我们看而不见时。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Unequal allocation of overt and covert attention in Multiple Object Tracking.在多项物体追踪中,显性和隐性注意力的分配不均。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1519-1537. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02501-7. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
The optimal use of computer aided detection to find low prevalence cancers.利用计算机辅助检测寻找低患病率癌症的最佳方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00361-1.
7
The hazards of perception: evaluating a change blindness demonstration within a real-world driver education course.感知的危害:在现实世界的驾驶员教育课程中评估变化盲视演示。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 May 21;4(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0165-4.
8
Not So Fast: Autistic traits and Anxious Apprehension in Real-World Visual Search Scenarios.别急:现实视觉搜索场景中的自闭症特质和焦虑预期。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 May;49(5):1795-1806. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-03874-1.
9
It is not good to talk: conversation has a fixed interference cost on attention regardless of difficulty.说话是不好的:无论难度如何,交谈对注意力都有固定的干扰成本。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Aug 22;3:33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0124-5. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance.眼动反馈无法提高视觉搜索性能。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0083-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.变化的目标出现频率揭示了视觉搜索中两种可分离的决策标准。
Curr Biol. 2010 Jan 26;20(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.066. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
2
Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed.即使在可纠正的搜索中,某些类型的罕见目标也经常被遗漏。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):541-53. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.541.
3
Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.我们为何会错过罕见目标?探索低患病率效应的边界。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 24;8(15):15.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.15.15.
4
Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.低目标患病率是视觉搜索任务中错误的顽固来源。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):623-38. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.623.
5
Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search.在可纠正搜索中,罕见目标很少被遗漏。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):943-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x.
6
Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.计算机辅助检测对乳腺钼靶筛查性能的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 5;356(14):1399-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066099.
7
Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches.认知心理学:视觉搜索中常遗漏稀有物品。
Nature. 2005 May 26;435(7041):439-40. doi: 10.1038/435439a.
8
Toward a unified theory of decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization.迈向感知分类中决策标准学习的统一理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):567-95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-567.
9
Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.视觉标记:对异步时间组的选择性注意。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):717-30.
10
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.用于视觉心理物理学的VideoToolbox软件:将数字转化为电影。
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42.

空间和时间上的分离无法抵消视觉搜索中低患病率的影响。

Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.

作者信息

Kunar Melina A, Rich Anina N, Wolfe Jeremy M

机构信息

The University of Warwick.

出版信息

Vis cogn. 2010 Jun 1;18(6):881-897. doi: 10.1080/13506280903361988.

DOI:10.1080/13506280903361988
PMID:21442052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3064483/
Abstract

Recent research has shown that, in visual search, participants can miss 30-40% of targets when they only appear rarely (i.e. on 1-2% of trials). Low target prevalence alters the behavior of the searcher. It can lead participants to quit their search prematurely (Wolfe et al., 2005), to shift their decision criteria (Wolfe et al., 2007) and/or to make motor or response errors (Fleck & Mitroff, 2007). In this paper we examine whether the LP Effect can be ameliorated if we split the search set in two, spreading the task out over space and/or time. Observers searched for the letter "T" among "L"s. In Experiment 1, the left or right half of the display was presented to the participants before the second half. In Experiment 2, items were spatially intermixed but half of the items were presented first, followed by the second half. Experiment 3 followed the methods of Experiment 2 but allowed observers to correct perceived errors. All three experiments produced robust low prevalence (LP) effects with higher errors at 2% prevalence than at 50% prevalence. Dividing up the display had no beneficial effect on errors. The opportunity to correct errors reduced but did not eliminate the LP effect. Low prevalence continues to elevate errors even when observers are forced to slow down and permitted to correct errors.

摘要

最近的研究表明,在视觉搜索中,当目标出现频率很低时(即仅在1%-2%的试验中出现),参与者可能会错过30%-40%的目标。低目标出现率会改变搜索者的行为。它可能导致参与者过早停止搜索(沃尔夫等人,2005年),改变他们的决策标准(沃尔夫等人,2007年)和/或出现动作或反应错误(弗莱克和米特罗夫,2007年)。在本文中,我们研究了如果将搜索集一分为二,在空间和/或时间上分散任务,是否可以改善低出现率效应(LP效应)。观察者在“L”中搜索字母“T”。在实验1中,显示屏的左半部分或右半部分先呈现给参与者,然后再呈现后半部分。在实验2中,项目在空间上混合,但一半的项目先呈现,然后是另一半。实验3遵循实验2的方法,但允许观察者纠正感知到的错误。所有三个实验都产生了显著的低出现率(LP)效应,2%出现率时的错误率高于50%出现率时的错误率。分割显示屏对错误没有有益影响。纠正错误的机会减少了,但并没有消除LP效应。即使观察者被迫放慢速度并被允许纠正错误,低出现率仍然会增加错误率。