Suppr超能文献

亲密关系体验-关系结构问卷:一种评估跨关系依恋取向的方法。

The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, 603 East Daniel St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):615-25. doi: 10.1037/a0022898.

Abstract

Most research on adult attachment is based on the assumption that working models are relatively general and trait-like. Recent research, however, suggests that people develop attachment representations that are relationship-specific, leading people to hold distinct working models in different relationships. The authors report a measure, the Relationship Structures questionnaire of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-RS; R. C. Fraley, N. G. Waller, & K. A. Brennan, 2000), that is designed to assess attachment dimensions in multiple contexts. Based on a sample of over 21,000 individuals studied online, it is shown that ECR-RS scores are reliable and have a structure similar to those produced by other measures. In Study 2 (N = 388), it is shown that relationship-specific measures of attachment generally predict intra- and interpersonal outcomes better than broader attachment measures but that broader measures predict personality traits better than relationship-specific measures. Moreover, it is demonstrated that differentiation in working models is not related to psychological outcomes independently of mean levels of security.

摘要

大多数关于成人依恋的研究都是基于这样一种假设,即工作模式是相对普遍和特质的。然而,最近的研究表明,人们会形成特定于关系的依恋表征,从而导致人们在不同的关系中有不同的工作模式。作者报告了一种衡量标准,即《亲密关系经历问卷修订版-关系结构量表》(ECR-RS;R.C.Fraley、N.G.Waller 和 K.A.Brennan,2000),旨在评估多个背景下的依恋维度。基于一个由超过 21000 名在线研究的个体组成的样本,结果表明 ECR-RS 分数是可靠的,并且具有与其他测量方法相似的结构。在研究 2(N=388)中,结果表明,与更广泛的依恋测量相比,特定于关系的依恋的度量通常能更好地预测个体内和人际间的结果,但更广泛的测量更能预测人格特质,而不是特定于关系的测量。此外,研究还表明,工作模式的分化与安全感的平均水平无关,而是与心理结果相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验