• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GRACE 评分在高敏心肌肌钙蛋白和 B 型利钠肽检测时代预测院内及 1 年预后的表现。

The GRACE score's performance in predicting in-hospital and 1-year outcome in the era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and B-type natriuretic peptide.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Heart. 2011 Sep;97(18):1479-83. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.220988. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1136/hrt.2010.220988
PMID:21444339
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of the GRACE score, a strong prognosticator in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that is calculated using conventional cardiac troponin (cTn) assays, with that calculated with high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) and with the combination of the GRACE score with hs-cTn or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP).

DESIGN

Prospective international cohort. Settings University Hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients enrolled in the Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation prospective study with proven ACS. Main outcome measured The capacity to predict in-hospital mortality, 1-year mortality and combined death/acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 1 year.

RESULTS

370 patients were enrolled (173 with unstable angina and 197 with AMI). In-hospital mortality was 4.1%; 1-year mortality was 12.5%. The GRACE score was significantly higher in patients who died than in those discharged alive (200 (174-222) vs 125 (98-155); p<0.001), and in those who died than in those who survived for 1 year (151 (133-169) vs 104 (85-125); p<0.001). The area under the curve of the GRACE score was 0.87 regarding in-hospital mortality and 0.88 for 1-year mortality; if calculated with hs-cTn, it was 0.87 and 0.88, respectively (p=NS for all comparisons). The addition of hs-cTn to the GRACE score resulted in no increased value, whereas the addition of BNP tended to improve 1-year mortality prediction (p=0.058).

CONCLUSION

The GRACE score is accurate for determining both in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with ACS in the era of hs-cTn. The addition of hs-cTn or BNP to the GRACE score does not significantly improve risk prediction.

摘要

目的

比较 GRACE 评分(一种基于传统心脏肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)强预后指标)、高敏 cTn(hs-cTn)计算的 GRACE 评分以及 GRACE 评分联合 hs-cTn 或 B 型利钠肽(BNP)在预测 ACS 患者院内死亡率、1 年死亡率和 1 年时死亡/急性心肌梗死(AMI)复合终点方面的准确性。

设计

前瞻性国际队列研究。研究地点:大学医院。

患者

前瞻性评估急性冠状动脉综合征预测因子研究中确诊为 ACS 的患者。主要观察指标:预测院内死亡率、1 年死亡率和 1 年时死亡/AMI 复合终点的能力。

结果

共纳入 370 例患者(不稳定型心绞痛 173 例,AMI 197 例)。院内死亡率为 4.1%,1 年死亡率为 12.5%。死亡患者的 GRACE 评分显著高于存活出院患者(200(174-222)vs. 125(98-155);p<0.001),也显著高于存活 1 年患者(151(133-169)vs. 104(85-125);p<0.001)。GRACE 评分预测院内死亡率和 1 年死亡率的曲线下面积分别为 0.87 和 0.88;如果使用 hs-cTn 计算,则分别为 0.87 和 0.88(所有比较的 p 值均无统计学意义)。hs-cTn 与 GRACE 评分联合使用并未增加价值,而 BNP 的加入则倾向于改善 1 年死亡率预测(p=0.058)。

结论

在 hs-cTn 时代,GRACE 评分可准确预测 ACS 患者的院内和长期死亡率。hs-cTn 或 BNP 与 GRACE 评分联合使用并不能显著改善风险预测。

相似文献

1
The GRACE score's performance in predicting in-hospital and 1-year outcome in the era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and B-type natriuretic peptide.GRACE 评分在高敏心肌肌钙蛋白和 B 型利钠肽检测时代预测院内及 1 年预后的表现。
Heart. 2011 Sep;97(18):1479-83. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.220988. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
2
Clinical correlation of multiple biomarkers for risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险评估中多种生物标志物的临床相关性
Indian Heart J. 2008 Nov-Dec;60(6):536-42.
3
Addition of B-type natriuretic peptide to the GRACE score to predict outcome in acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective (development) and prospective (validation) cohort-based study.B 型利钠肽在 GRACE 评分中对急性冠状动脉综合征预后的预测价值:一项基于回顾性(开发)和前瞻性(验证)队列的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Apr;29(4):274-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.104422. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
4
[Prognostic value of point of care B-type natriuretic peptide testing and GRACE score in patients with acute coronary syndrome].[即时检测B型利钠肽及GRACE评分在急性冠脉综合征患者中的预后价值]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;37(8):716-20.
5
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide complements the GRACE risk score in predicting early and late mortality following acute coronary syndrome.N 末端前 B 型利钠肽在预测急性冠状动脉综合征后的早期和晚期死亡率方面补充了全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)风险评分。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2009 Jun 2;117(1):31-9. doi: 10.1042/CS20080419.
6
Quantitative troponin elevation does not provide incremental prognostic value beyond comprehensive risk stratification in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.在非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中,肌钙蛋白定量升高在全面风险分层之外并未提供额外的预后价值。
Am Heart J. 2008 Apr;155(4):718-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.012. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
7
Improving long-term risk prediction in patients with acute chest pain: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is enhanced by selected nonnecrosis biomarkers.改善急性胸痛患者的长期风险预测:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)风险评分通过选择的非坏死生物标志物得到增强。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.002.
8
Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality after acute coronary syndrome and identifies high-risk patients across the range of troponin values.心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白可预测急性冠脉综合征后的长期死亡率,并在肌钙蛋白值的整个范围内识别高危患者。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 20;50(21):2061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.021. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
9
The impact of B-type natriuretic peptide in addition to troponin I, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin on the risk stratification of emergency department chest pain patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.除肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶-MB和肌红蛋白外,B型利钠肽对疑似急性冠脉综合征的急诊科胸痛患者风险分层的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.024. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
10
Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada.加拿大急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院死亡率的全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)风险评分的验证
Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Prediction Models for Ischemic Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者缺血性心血管事件的风险预测模型
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 13;24(4):106. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2404106. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
The role of the osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK axis and osteopontin in acute coronary syndrome.骨保护素/核因子κB受体活化因子配体/核因子κB受体活化因子轴及骨桥蛋白在急性冠状动脉综合征中的作用
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024 May 29;95(1):1-8. doi: 10.24875/ACM.24000037.
3
A Prediction Model Based on Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index Combined with Other Predictors for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.
基于全身免疫炎症指数联合其他预测指标的急性心肌梗死患者主要不良心血管事件预测模型
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Feb 22;17:1211-1225. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S443153. eCollection 2024.
4
Prognostic utility of a multi-biomarker panel in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.多生物标志物组合对疑似心肌梗死患者的预后评估作用
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Dec;113(12):1682-1691. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02345-7. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in MINOCA: A Comparison among GRACE, TIMI, HEART, and ACEF Scores.心肌梗死伴非阻塞性冠状动脉病变(MINOCA)中预后评分系统的性能:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)、心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)、心肌梗死全球登记处(HEART)和急性冠状动脉事件全球注册欧洲分支(ACEF)评分的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5687. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175687.
6
Contemporary Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: Performance of Scores and Incremental Value of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2.社区人群心肌梗死后当代风险分层:评分表现和可溶性肿瘤抑制物-2 的增量价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 20;6(10):e005958. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005958.
7
Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: can its failure be predicted?ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心脏康复:其失败能否被预测?
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jul;11(7):177-184. doi: 10.1177/1753944717706845. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Predictive value of NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a comparison with the GRACE and TIMI risk scores.NT-proBNP对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者30天死亡率的预测价值:与GRACE和TIMI风险评分的比较
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Nov 21;12:471-476. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S117204. eCollection 2016.
9
Establishment of a hybrid risk model to predict major cardiac adverse events in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.建立一种混合风险模型以预测非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的主要心脏不良事件。
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Jul;12(1):427-432. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3270. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Risk scores, biomarkers and clinical judgment.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的风险分层:风险评分、生物标志物与临床判断。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Sep 1;8:131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.06.009.