Li Xiaobo, Yu Chen, Liu Xuewei, Chen Yejia, Wang Yutian, Liang Hongbin, Qiu ShiFeng, Lei Li, Xiu Jiancheng
Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, Xiangdong Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Liling, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Feb 22;17:1211-1225. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S443153. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) for predicting in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and establish a relevant nomogram.
This study included 954 AMI patients. We examined three inflammatory factors (SII, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) to see which one predicts in-hospital MACEs better. The predictors were subsequently screened using bidirectional stepwise regression method, and a MACE nomogram was constructed via logistic regression analysis. The predictive value of the model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis. We also compared the nomogram with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scoring system.
334 (35.0%) patients had MACEs. The SII (AUC =0.684) had a greater predictive value for in-hospital MACEs in AMI patients than the PLR (AUC =0.597, P<0.001) or NLR (AUC=0.654, P=0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) of the SII-based multivariable model for predicting MACEs, which was based on the SII, Killip classification, left ventricular ejection fraction, age, urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration and electrocardiogram-based diagnosis, was 0.862 (95% CI: 0.833-0.891). Decision curve and calibration curve analysis revealed that SII-based multivariable model demonstrated a good fit and calibration and provided positive net benefits than the model without SII. The predictive value of the SII-based multivariable model was greater than that of the GRACE scoring system (P<0.001).
SII is a promising, reliable biomarker for identifying AMI patients at high risk of in-hospital MACEs, and SII-based multivariable model may serve as a quick and easy tool to identify these patients.
评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者院内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预后价值,并建立相关列线图。
本研究纳入954例AMI患者。我们检测了三种炎症因子(SII、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)),以确定哪一种对院内MACE的预测效果更好。随后使用双向逐步回归法筛选预测因子,并通过逻辑回归分析构建MACE列线图。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性评估模型的预测价值。此外,使用决策曲线分析评估列线图的临床实用性。我们还将列线图与全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分系统进行了比较。
334例(35.0%)患者发生MACE。SII(AUC =0.684)对AMI患者院内MACE的预测价值高于PLR(AUC =0.597,P<0.001)或NLR(AUC =0.654,P =0.01)。基于SII、Killip分级、左心室射血分数、年龄、尿素氮(BUN)浓度和基于心电图的诊断构建的用于预测MACE的基于SII的多变量模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.862(95%CI:0.833 - 0.891)。决策曲线和校准曲线分析显示,基于SII的多变量模型显示出良好的拟合度和校准度,并且比不含SII的模型提供了更大的净效益。基于SII的多变量模型的预测价值高于GRACE评分系统(P<0.001)。
SII是一种有前景、可靠的生物标志物,可用于识别有院内MACE高风险的AMI患者,基于SII的多变量模型可作为识别这些患者的快速简便工具。