Suppr超能文献

双侧全膝关节置换术后引流夹的比较

Comparison of drain clamp after bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Madadi Firooz, Mehrvarz Amir Sarshekeh, Madadi Firoozeh, Boreiri Majid, Abachizadeh Kambiz, Ershadi Ali

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akhtar Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2010 Dec;23(4):215-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271891.

Abstract

Suction drains provide an easy and feasible method for controlling hemorrhage after total knee arthroplasty. However, there has been no compromise regarding the optimum clamping time for these drains. We conducted a randomized clinical trial in 50 patients to compare 12-hour drain clamping and continuous drainage after total knee arthroplasty in terms of wound complications, blood loss, and articular arc of motion. To eliminate any other factor except duration of clamping, we chose to compare only knees belonging to a single patient and to restrict the study to those knees undergoing surgery due to osteoarthritis. From a total of 100 knees (50 patients) studied, the 12-hour-clamping method resulted in a significantly smaller amount of postoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). The passive ranges of motion and wound complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

摘要

负压引流为全膝关节置换术后控制出血提供了一种简便可行的方法。然而,对于这些引流管的最佳夹闭时间尚无定论。我们对50例患者进行了一项随机临床试验,比较全膝关节置换术后12小时夹闭引流管与持续引流在伤口并发症、失血量和关节活动弧度方面的差异。为消除夹闭时间以外的任何其他因素,我们选择仅比较同一患者的双膝,并将研究限制在因骨关节炎接受手术的膝关节。在总共研究的100个膝关节(50例患者)中,12小时夹闭法导致术后失血量显著减少(p < 0.001)。两组之间的被动活动范围和伤口并发症无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验