Suppr超能文献

四小时引流夹闭技术在全髋关节置换术后减少失血方面的疗效:一项前瞻性队列研究

Efficacy of a Four-Hour Drainage Clamping Technique in the Reduction of Blood Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Zan Pengfei, Yao Jie J, Fan Lin, Yang Yong, Zhou Zifei, Wu Zhong, Zhu Chunyan, Yang Dong, Li Guodong

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 3;23:2708-2714. doi: 10.12659/msm.904864.

Abstract

BACKGROUND During total hip arthroplasty (THA) drainage is used by most surgeons. However, the optimal drainage strategy remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a four-hour drainage clamping technique in patients undergoing THA. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 64 patients who underwent THA from March 2012 to December 2015 who were enrolled in the study; 32 patients were randomly assigned to four hours of a drainage clamping technique (clamping group); 32 patients were treated with a non-clamping drainage technique (non-clamping group). All perioperative clinical details were recorded for comparative analysis. RESULTS The postoperative drainage volume and calculated blood loss were significantly greater in the drainage non-clamping group, p<0.001 and p=0.028, respectively. Significantly more patients in the drainage non-clamping group required a blood transfusion, seven cases versus one case (p=0.023). Significantly more units of blood were transfused in the drainage non-clamping group (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for all other clinical outcome factors. CONCLUSIONS The four-hour drainage clamping technique following THA, compared with drainage non-clamping technique reduced blood loss and requirement for blood transfusion. There was no increase in adverse clinical events using the four-hour drainage clamping method. Therefore, four-hour drainage clamping has the potential for routine use in THA.

摘要

背景 在全髋关节置换术(THA)过程中,大多数外科医生会采用引流。然而,最佳引流策略仍存在争议。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是确定在接受THA的患者中采用四小时引流夹闭技术的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法 纳入了2012年3月至2015年12月期间接受THA的64例患者;32例患者被随机分配至四小时引流夹闭技术组(夹闭组);32例患者采用非夹闭引流技术治疗(非夹闭组)。记录所有围手术期临床细节以进行对比分析。

结果 引流非夹闭组术后引流量和计算得出的失血量显著更多,分别为p<0.001和p=0.028。引流非夹闭组需要输血的患者明显更多,7例对1例(p=0.023)。引流非夹闭组输注的血液单位明显更多(p=0.001)。所有其他临床结局因素未发现显著差异。

结论 与非夹闭引流技术相比,THA术后采用四小时引流夹闭技术可减少失血量和输血需求。采用四小时引流夹闭方法未增加不良临床事件。因此,四小时引流夹闭有在THA中常规使用的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec7/5467705/7ee62ebfd42a/medscimonit-23-2708-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验