Zan Pengfei, Yao Jie J, Fan Lin, Yang Yong, Zhou Zifei, Wu Zhong, Zhu Chunyan, Yang Dong, Li Guodong
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 3;23:2708-2714. doi: 10.12659/msm.904864.
BACKGROUND During total hip arthroplasty (THA) drainage is used by most surgeons. However, the optimal drainage strategy remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a four-hour drainage clamping technique in patients undergoing THA. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 64 patients who underwent THA from March 2012 to December 2015 who were enrolled in the study; 32 patients were randomly assigned to four hours of a drainage clamping technique (clamping group); 32 patients were treated with a non-clamping drainage technique (non-clamping group). All perioperative clinical details were recorded for comparative analysis. RESULTS The postoperative drainage volume and calculated blood loss were significantly greater in the drainage non-clamping group, p<0.001 and p=0.028, respectively. Significantly more patients in the drainage non-clamping group required a blood transfusion, seven cases versus one case (p=0.023). Significantly more units of blood were transfused in the drainage non-clamping group (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for all other clinical outcome factors. CONCLUSIONS The four-hour drainage clamping technique following THA, compared with drainage non-clamping technique reduced blood loss and requirement for blood transfusion. There was no increase in adverse clinical events using the four-hour drainage clamping method. Therefore, four-hour drainage clamping has the potential for routine use in THA.
背景 在全髋关节置换术(THA)过程中,大多数外科医生会采用引流。然而,最佳引流策略仍存在争议。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是确定在接受THA的患者中采用四小时引流夹闭技术的安全性和有效性。
材料与方法 纳入了2012年3月至2015年12月期间接受THA的64例患者;32例患者被随机分配至四小时引流夹闭技术组(夹闭组);32例患者采用非夹闭引流技术治疗(非夹闭组)。记录所有围手术期临床细节以进行对比分析。
结果 引流非夹闭组术后引流量和计算得出的失血量显著更多,分别为p<0.001和p=0.028。引流非夹闭组需要输血的患者明显更多,7例对1例(p=0.023)。引流非夹闭组输注的血液单位明显更多(p=0.001)。所有其他临床结局因素未发现显著差异。
结论 与非夹闭引流技术相比,THA术后采用四小时引流夹闭技术可减少失血量和输血需求。采用四小时引流夹闭方法未增加不良临床事件。因此,四小时引流夹闭有在THA中常规使用的潜力。