• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队管理对头颈部癌症患者的影响。

Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients.

机构信息

Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2011 Apr 12;104(8):1246-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.92. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2011.92
PMID:21448166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3078600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analysed the outcomes of 726 cases of primary head and neck cancer patients managed between 1996 and 2008, including those managed in the multidisciplinary clinic or team setting (MDT) and those managed outside of an MDT by individual disciplines (non-MDT) in the same institution.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Hospital Based Cancer Registry and a database within the Head and Neck Cancer Clinic. Univariable comparisons and multivariable analyses were performed using a logistic regression model. Survival by staging was analysed. Comparisons of management and outcomes were made between MDT and non-MDT patients.

RESULTS

395 patients (54%) had been managed in the MDT vs 331 patients (46%) non-MDT. MDT patients were more likely to have advanced disease (likelihood ratio χ(2)=44.7, P<0.001). Stage IV MDT patients had significantly improved 5-year survival compared with non-MDT patients (hazard ratio=0.69, 95% CI=0.51-0.88, P=0.004) and more synchronous chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.004), and the non-MDT group had more radiotherapy as a single modality (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved survival of MDT-managed stage IV patients probably represents both the selection of multimodality treatment and chemotherapeutic advances that these patients received in a multidisciplinary team setting by head and neck cancer specialists as opposed to cancer generalists in a non-MDT setting.

摘要

背景

我们分析了 1996 年至 2008 年间管理的 726 例原发性头颈部癌症患者的结果,包括在多学科临床或团队环境(MDT)中管理的患者和在同一机构的 MDT 之外由单个学科管理的患者(非-MDT)。

方法

数据从医院癌症登记处和头颈部癌症诊所的数据库中收集。使用逻辑回归模型进行单变量比较和多变量分析。按分期分析生存情况。对 MDT 和非 MDT 患者的管理和结果进行比较。

结果

395 例(54%)患者在 MDT 中管理,331 例(46%)患者在非 MDT 中管理。MDT 患者更有可能患有晚期疾病(似然比 χ(2)=44.7,P<0.001)。与非 MDT 患者相比,IV 期 MDT 患者的 5 年生存率显著提高(风险比=0.69,95%CI=0.51-0.88,P=0.004),并且更多地接受同步化疗和放疗(P=0.004),而非 MDT 组更多地接受放疗作为单一治疗方式(P=0.002)。

结论

MDT 管理的 IV 期患者的生存改善可能既代表了多模式治疗的选择,也代表了这些患者在头颈部癌症专家的多学科团队环境中接受的化疗进展,而不是在非 MDT 环境中由癌症普通专家接受的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a2b/3078600/a9170893c58e/bjc201192f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a2b/3078600/9472d8b3017a/bjc201192f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a2b/3078600/a9170893c58e/bjc201192f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a2b/3078600/9472d8b3017a/bjc201192f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a2b/3078600/a9170893c58e/bjc201192f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of multidisciplinary team management in head and neck cancer patients.多学科团队管理对头颈部癌症患者的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Apr 12;104(8):1246-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.92. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
2
Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer.多学科诊所护理可提高头颈部癌症最佳实践的依从性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.010.
3
Integrated therapeutic approaches in head and neck cancer: the importance of multidisciplinary team management.头颈部癌症的综合治疗方法:多学科团队管理的重要性。
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013 Jul 1;13(6):834-43. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990110.
4
The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.多学科团队会议对肿瘤学环境中患者评估、管理和结局的影响:文献系统评价。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jan;42:56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.非黑色素瘤皮肤癌:英国国家多学科指南
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S125-S132. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000554.
6
Association of Disease Recurrence With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated With Multimodality Therapy.多模态治疗对头颈部皮肤鳞状细胞癌患者的疾病复发与生存结局的相关性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):442-447. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5453.
7
Split course hyperfractionated accelerated radio-chemotherapy (SCHARC) for patients with advanced head and neck cancer: influence of protocol deviations and hemoglobin on overall survival, a retrospective analysis.晚期头颈癌患者的分割疗程超分割加速放化疗(SCHARC):方案偏差和血红蛋白对总生存的影响,一项回顾性分析
BMC Cancer. 2006 Dec 7;6:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-279.
8
Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team.通过结直肠癌多学科团队提高患者生存率。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01580.x. Epub 2008 May 9.
9
Prognostic significance of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌中基底样鳞状细胞癌的预后意义。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1306-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5308.
10
Patterns of Treatment Failure and Postrecurrence Outcomes Among Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemoradiotherapy Using Modern Radiation Techniques.采用现代放射技术治疗后,局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的治疗失败模式和复发后结局。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1487-1494. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0973.

引用本文的文献

1
Regionalization of Health Care in Head and Neck Cancer: Concept and Considerations.头颈癌医疗保健的区域化:概念与考量
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Aug 20;29(3):1-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1802574. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Significance of Multidisciplinary Teams for Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Diseases: An Observational Retrospective Study in a General Hospital in China.多学科团队对口腔颌面外科疾病患者的意义:中国一家综合医院的观察性回顾性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 30;17:6187-6198. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S504720. eCollection 2024.
3
Multidisciplinary tumor boards in oral cavity cancer: survival effect due to balancing guideline adherence and treatment delays.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?癌症治疗中的多学科团队协作:证据有哪些?
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c951. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c951.
2
Tumour boards/multidisciplinary head and neck cancer meetings: are they of value to patients, treating staff or a political additional drain on healthcare resources?肿瘤学专家委员会/多学科头颈癌会议:它们对患者、治疗人员有价值吗?还是会成为医疗资源的一种政治负担?
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;16(2):103-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f6a4c4.
3
The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients.
口腔癌多学科肿瘤委员会:平衡指南遵循与治疗延迟对生存的影响
Front Oral Health. 2024 Nov 15;5:1493319. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1493319. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding the effectiveness and quality of virtual cancer multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): a systematic scoping review.理解虚拟癌症多学科团队会议(MDTMs)的效果和质量:系统范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):1481. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11984-z.
5
Impact of Preoperative Multidisciplinary Conference on Head and Neck Reconstruction Outcomes.术前多学科会议对头颈部重建结果的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2025 Jan;135(1):110-117. doi: 10.1002/lary.31665. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Oncological and functional outcomes in T3 and T4 laryngeal cancer patients: choice for larynx preservation or total laryngectomy based on expected laryngeal function.T3 和 T4 喉癌患者的肿瘤学和功能预后:基于预期喉功能选择保留喉或全喉切除术。
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 Jun;138(6):672-678. doi: 10.1017/S0022215124000112. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
7
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumor Board on Treatment and Survival in Laryngeal Carcinoma.多学科头颈部肿瘤委员会对喉癌治疗和生存的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 23;30(12):10085-10099. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120733.
8
Multidisciplinary Team Meeting in the Core of Nasopharyngeal Cancer Management Improved Quality of Care and Survival of Patients.鼻咽癌多学科团队核心会议提高了患者的护理质量和生存率。
Health Serv Insights. 2023 Oct 16;16:11786329231204757. doi: 10.1177/11786329231204757. eCollection 2023.
9
Application of Minimally Invasive Surgery-Multidisciplinary Team in Advanced and Recurrent Gynecological Cancers: 10-Year Exploration and Practice.微创手术多学科团队在晚期及复发性妇科癌症中的应用:十年探索与实践
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Nov 7;12(3):141-147. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_64_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
10
Changes in multidisciplinary team decisions in a high volume head and neck oncological center following those made in its preferred partner.在一家大型头颈肿瘤中心,多学科团队的决策相较于其首选合作伙伴做出的决策所发生的变化。
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;13:1205224. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1205224. eCollection 2023.
卡尔曼-海因报告对约克郡结直肠癌患者护理流程及结果的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 23;95(8):979-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603372.
4
Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer.多学科团队管理与食管癌手术后改善的预后相关。
Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00559.x.
5
Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England.流程标准对英格兰南部和西部头颈癌患者生存率的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2004 Oct 18;91(8):1477-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118.
6
Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters.卵巢癌的管理:转诊至多学科团队很重要。
Br J Cancer. 1994 Aug;70(2):363-70. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.307.
7
A Wilcoxon-type test for trend.一种用于趋势分析的威尔科克森型检验。
Stat Med. 1985 Jan-Mar;4(1):87-90. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040112.