• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队管理与食管癌手术后改善的预后相关。

Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Stephens M R, Lewis W G, Brewster A E, Lord I, Blackshaw G R J C, Hodzovic I, Thomas G V, Roberts S A, Crosby T D L, Gent C, Allison M C, Shute K

机构信息

Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00559.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00559.x
PMID:16722993
Abstract

We aim to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing R0 esophagectomy by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) with outcomes after surgery alone performed by surgeons working independently in a UK cancer unit. An historical control group of 77 consecutive patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer and undergoing surgery with curative intent by six general surgeons between 1991 and 1997 (54 R0 esophagectomies) were compared with a group of 67 consecutive patients managed by the MDT between 1998 and 2003 (53 R0 esophagectomies, 26 patients received multimodal therapy). The proportion of patients undergoing open and closed laparotomy and thoracotomy decreased from 21% and 5%, respectively, in control patients, to 13% and 0% in MDT patients (chi2 = 11.90, DF = 1, P = 0.001; chi2 = 5.45, DF = 1, P = 0.02 respectively). MDT patients had lower operative mortality (5.7%vs. 26%; chi2 = 8.22, DF = 1, P = 0.004) than control patients, and were more likely to survive 5 years (52%vs. 10%, chi2 = 15.05, P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, MDT management (HR = 0.337, 95% CI = 0.201-0.564, P < 0.001), lymph node metastases (HR = 1.728, 95% CI = 1.070-2.792, P = 0.025), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (HR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.412-3.450, P = 0.001) were independently associated with duration of survival. Multidisciplinary team management and surgical subspecialization improved outcomes after surgery significantly for patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

摘要

我们旨在比较由多学科团队(MDT)进行R0食管癌切除术的患者的治疗结果与英国一家癌症治疗中心独立工作的外科医生单纯手术后的治疗结果。将1991年至1997年间由六位普通外科医生连续诊断为食管癌并接受根治性手术的77例患者(54例行R0食管癌切除术)作为历史对照组,与1998年至2003年间由MDT治疗的67例连续患者(53例行R0食管癌切除术,26例患者接受多模式治疗)进行比较。接受开腹和开胸手术的患者比例在对照组中分别为21%和5%,在MDT组中降至13%和0%(卡方检验,分别为χ2 = 11.90,自由度DF = 1,P = 0.001;χ2 = 5.45,自由度DF = 1,P = 0.02)。MDT组患者的手术死亡率低于对照组(5.7%对26%;χ2 = 8.22,自由度DF = 1,P = 0.004),并且更有可能存活5年(52%对10%,χ2 = 15.05,P = 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,MDT管理(风险比HR = 0.337,95%置信区间CI = 0.201 - 0.564,P < 0.001)、淋巴结转移(HR = 1.728,95%置信区间CI = 1.070 - 2.792,P = 0.025)和美国麻醉医师协会分级(HR = 2.207,95%置信区间CI = 1.412 - 3.450,P = 0.001)与生存时间独立相关。多学科团队管理和外科亚专业化显著改善了食管癌患者手术后的治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer.多学科团队管理与食管癌手术后改善的预后相关。
Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00559.x.
2
Comparison of esophagectomy with and without thoracotomy in a low-resource tertiary care center in a developing country.在发展中国家的一个资源匮乏的三级保健中心比较有无胸切开的食管切除术。
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Nov;24(8):583-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01194.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
Self-expanding covered metallic stent as a bridge to surgery in esophageal cancer: impact on oncologic outcomes.自膨式覆膜金属支架作为食管癌手术的桥梁:对肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Mar;220(3):287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.028. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Prognostic significance of body mass indices for patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.体重指数对食管癌切除术患者的预后意义
Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(1):29-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00637.x.
5
Current outcome of esophagectomy in the very elderly: experience of a German high-volume center.高龄患者食管癌切除术的当前疗效:德国一家高手术量中心的经验
Am Surg. 2013 Aug;79(8):754-63.
6
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Survival after esophageal resection for carcinoma: the importance of the histologic cell type.食管癌切除术后的生存率:组织学细胞类型的重要性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):1073-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.012.
8
Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center.低容量手术治疗高容量转诊中心食管癌的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3219-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0700-5. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
9
Extent of lymph node removal during esophageal cancer surgery and survival.食管癌手术中淋巴结清扫的范围与生存。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 5;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv043. Print 2015 May.
10
Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.黏膜下食管癌行扩大淋巴结清扫的食管切除术:长期结果和预后因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):750-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2023-6. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Perioperative Care in Esophageal Surgery: The EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking (EUPEMEN) Collaborative for Esophagectomy.优化食管癌手术围手术期护理:欧洲围手术期医学网络(EUPEMEN)食管癌切除术协作组
Diseases. 2025 Jul 22;13(8):231. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080231.
2
Evaluating Treatment Plan Modifications from Surgeons' Initial Recommendations to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Consensus for Cancer Care in a Resource-Limited Setting.在资源有限的环境中,评估从外科医生的初始建议到多学科肿瘤委员会关于癌症治疗共识的治疗方案修改情况。
Curr Oncol. 2025 May 28;32(6):310. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060310.
3
Resident shortages and their impact on surgical care, defensive medicine, and patient management: a retrospective study in South Korea.
住院医师短缺及其对外科护理、防御性医疗和患者管理的影响:韩国的一项回顾性研究。
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(1):32-39. doi: 10.14216/kjco.25331. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
4
Appropriateness of multidisciplinary treatment related to the adequacy evaluation of gastric cancer from the surgeon's point of view: a retrospective cohort study.从外科医生角度看与胃癌充分评估相关的多学科治疗的适宜性:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Apr;108(4):240-244. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.240. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
A Rare Case of Atypical Pelvic Retroperitoneal Lipoma Mimicking Liposarcoma; A Case Report and Review of Literature.一例罕见的非典型盆腔腹膜后脂肪瘤酷似脂肪肉瘤的病例报告及文献复习
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Feb 20;13(2):e70236. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70236. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline).《2024年韩国胃癌诊疗指南:基于证据的多学科方法(2022年指南更新)》
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):5-114. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e11.
7
Inter-rater variability in multidisciplinary team meetings of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer on staging, resectability and treatment recommendation: national retrospective multicentre study.多学科团队会议中食管和食管胃交界部癌在分期、可切除性及治疗建议方面的评分者间差异:全国性回顾性多中心研究
BJS Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae140.
8
Multidisciplinary team meetings improve survival in patients with esophageal cancer.多学科团队会议可提高食管癌患者的生存率。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Oct 28;37(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae061.
9
Complex hidradenitis suppurativa on a background of long-standing Crohn's disease requiring radical pelvic and perineal reconstruction: A case report.以长期克罗恩病为背景的复杂性化脓性汗腺炎,需进行根治性盆腔与会阴重建:一例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Jul 19;12(7):e9203. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9203. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Attitudes of physicians and patients toward immediate and intraoperative chemotherapy treatment in colon cancer.医生和患者对结肠癌即刻和术中化疗治疗的态度。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2024;39:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100798. Epub 2024 Feb 22.