Medical College of Georgia, School of Medicine, Augusta, GA, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Apr;33(4):950-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22486.
To determine core body temperature variations in children undergoing MRI exams on 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic field strengths and with and without propofol sedation.
Temporal artery temperatures were prospectively collected on 400 consecutive patients undergoing 1.5 Tesla (T) or 3.0T MRI scans. A cumulative logistic regression model was created using age, weight, MRI protocol, sedation status, pre-MRI temperature and MRI strength to assess risk of temperature change.
For patients with complete pre- and post-MRI temperature data, mean temperatures did not significantly change (-0.0155°C, 95%CI, -0.035, 0.064; n = 385). Temperature changes differed significantly between propofol-sedated and nonsedated patients (-0.26°C ± .44 versus 0.24°C ± 0.42; P < 0.0001), as did temperature changes for patients on the 3T (0.076°C ± 0.52) versus 1.5T (-0.06°C ± 0.48; P = 0.011). Sedation status, age, MRI strength, and MRI protocol accounted for 44.17% of temperature variance. The temperatures of 15 patients' (3.9%) decreased >1°C; 12 were on the 1.5T. All 7 patients (1.8%) who increased >1°C were non-sedates.
Clinically significant core body temperature change is uncommon in children undergoing MRI with different magnetic field strengths, and with and without propofol sedation.
确定在 1.5T 和 3T 磁场强度下进行 MRI 检查的儿童的核心体温变化,并比较有无异丙酚镇静的情况。
对 400 例连续接受 1.5T 或 3.0T MRI 扫描的患者进行前瞻性收集颞动脉温度。使用年龄、体重、MRI 方案、镇静状态、MRI 前温度和 MRI 强度的累积逻辑回归模型来评估温度变化的风险。
对于有完整的 MRI 前和后体温数据的患者,平均体温没有显著变化(-0.0155°C,95%CI,-0.035,0.064;n=385)。在镇静和非镇静患者之间,体温变化差异显著(-0.26°C±0.44 与 0.24°C±0.42;P<0.0001),3T(0.076°C±0.52)与 1.5T(-0.06°C±0.48;P=0.011)之间也有差异。镇静状态、年龄、MRI 强度和 MRI 方案占体温变异的 44.17%。15 名患者(3.9%)的体温下降>1°C;其中 12 名在 1.5T。所有 7 名体温升高>1°C的患者(1.8%)均未接受镇静。
在不同磁场强度下进行 MRI 检查,以及有无异丙酚镇静的情况下,儿童的核心体温发生显著变化并不常见。