Berlin J A, Colditz G A
Technology Assessment Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;132(4):612-28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115704.
Evidence for an independent role of increased physical activity in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease has grown in recent years. The authors apply the techniques of meta-analysis to data extracted from the published literature by Powell et al. (Ann Rev Public Health 1987;8:253-87), as well as more recent studies addressing this relation, in order to make formal quantitative statements and to explore features of study design that influence the observed relation between physical activity and coronary heart disease risk. They find, for example, a summary relative risk of death from coronary heart disease of 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.6-2.2) for sedentary compared with active occupations. The authors also find that methodologically stronger studies tend to show a larger benefit of physical activity than less well-designed studies.
近年来,越来越多的证据表明增加体力活动在冠心病一级预防中具有独立作用。作者运用荟萃分析技术,对Powell等人(《公共卫生年度评论》1987年;8:253 - 87)发表的文献以及近期探讨该关系的研究中提取的数据进行分析,以便做出正式的定量陈述,并探究影响体力活动与冠心病风险之间观察到的关系的研究设计特征。例如,他们发现,与从事体力活动的职业相比,从事久坐职业的人死于冠心病的汇总相对风险为1.9(95%置信区间1.6 - 2.2)。作者还发现,方法学上更严谨的研究往往比设计欠佳的研究显示出体力活动带来的更大益处。