Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Mar 30;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-13.
Even effective interventions for people with dementia and their caregivers require specific implementation efforts. A pilot study showed that the highly effective community occupational therapy in dementia (COTiD) program was not implemented optimally due to various barriers. To decrease these barriers and make implementation of the program more effective a combined implementation (CI) strategy was developed. In our study we will compare the effectiveness of this CI strategy with the usual educational (ED) strategy.
In this cluster randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial, each cluster consists of at least two occupational therapists, a manager, and a physician working at Dutch healthcare organizations that deliver community occupational therapy. Forty-five clusters, stratified by healthcare setting (nursing home, hospital, mental health service), have been allocated randomly to either the intervention group (CI strategy) or the control group (ED strategy). The study population consists of the professionals included in each cluster and community-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers. The primary outcome measures are the use of community OT, the adherence of OTs to the COTiD program, and the cost effectiveness of implementing the COTiD program in outpatient care. Secondary outcome measures are patient and caregiver outcomes and knowledge of managers, physicians and OTs about the COTiD program.
Implementation research is fairly new in the field of occupational therapy, making this a unique study. This study does not only evaluate the effects of the CI-strategy on professionals, but also the effects of professionals' degree of implementation on client and caregiver outcomes.
NCT01117285.
即使是针对痴呆症患者及其照护者的有效干预措施,也需要具体的实施努力。一项试点研究表明,由于各种障碍,高度有效的社区职业治疗痴呆症(COTiD)项目并未得到最佳实施。为了减少这些障碍,使该项目的实施更加有效,我们开发了一种联合实施(CI)策略。在我们的研究中,我们将比较这种 CI 策略与常规教育(ED)策略的有效性。
在这项聚类随机、单盲、对照试验中,每个聚类由至少两名职业治疗师、一名经理和一名在提供社区职业治疗的荷兰医疗机构工作的医生组成。将 45 个聚类按医疗保健环境(疗养院、医院、精神卫生服务)分层,随机分配到干预组(CI 策略)或对照组(ED 策略)。研究人群包括每个聚类中的专业人员以及居住在社区中的痴呆症患者及其照护者。主要结局指标是社区职业治疗的使用、职业治疗师对 COTiD 计划的依从性以及在门诊护理中实施 COTiD 计划的成本效益。次要结局指标是患者和照护者的结果以及经理、医生和职业治疗师对 COTiD 计划的了解。
实施研究在职业治疗领域相当新,这使得这项研究具有独特性。这项研究不仅评估了 CI 策略对专业人员的影响,还评估了专业人员实施程度对患者和照护者结果的影响。
NCT01117285。