University of Pennsylvania, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Dec;35(6):849-87. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2010-032.
Conventional wisdom suggests that the best way to persuade Americans to support changes in health care policy is to appeal to their self-interest - particularly to concerns about their economic and health security. An alternative strategy, framing problems in the health care system to emphasize inequalities, could also, however, mobilize public support for policy change by activating underlying attitudes about the unfairness or injustice of these inequalities. In this article, we draw on original data from a nationally representative survey to describe Americans' beliefs about fairness in the health domain, including their perceptions of the fairness of particular inequalities in health and health care. We then assess the influence of these fairness considerations on opinions about the appropriate role of private actors versus government in providing health insurance. Respondents believe inequalities in access to and quality of health care are more unfair than unequal health outcomes. Even after taking into account self-interest considerations and the other usual suspects driving policy opinions, perceptions of the unfairness of inequalities in health care strongly influence respondents' preferences for government provision of health insurance.
传统观点认为,要说服美国人支持医疗政策的改变,最好的方法是唤起他们的自身利益——尤其是对经济和健康安全的关注。然而,通过将医疗体系中的问题框定为强调不平等,另一种策略——凸显这些不平等的不公平或不公正之处——也可以通过激活人们对这些不平等的不公平性或不公正性的潜在态度,为政策变革调动公众支持。在本文中,我们利用一项全国代表性调查的原始数据,描述了美国人对健康领域公平性的看法,包括他们对健康和医疗保健特定不平等的公平性的看法。然后,我们评估了这些公平性考虑因素对关于私人行为者与政府在提供健康保险方面的适当角色的看法的影响。受访者认为,在获得和医疗保健质量方面的不平等比健康结果的不平等更不公平。即使考虑到自身利益的考虑因素以及推动政策意见的其他常见因素,对医疗保健不平等不公平性的看法强烈影响了受访者对政府提供健康保险的偏好。