• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群健康科学:履行公共卫生使命。

Population Health Science: Fulfilling the Mission of Public Health.

机构信息

University of California at Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):9-23. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12493. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12493
PMID:33320388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984664/
Abstract

Policy Points The historical mission of public health is to ensure the conditions in which people can be healthy, and yet the field of public health has been distracted from this mission by an excessive reliance on randomized-control trials, a lack of formal theoretical models, and a fear of politics. The field of population health science has emerged to rigorously address all of these constraints. It deserves ongoing and formal institutional support.

摘要

政策要点 公共卫生的历史使命是确保人们能够健康的条件,然而,公共卫生领域过于依赖随机对照试验、缺乏正式的理论模型以及对政治的恐惧,已经偏离了这一使命。人口健康科学领域的出现就是为了严格解决所有这些限制。它值得持续和正式的制度支持。

相似文献

1
Population Health Science: Fulfilling the Mission of Public Health.人群健康科学:履行公共卫生使命。
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):9-23. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12493. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
Academic Advocacy: Opportunities to Influence Health and Science Policy Under U.S. Lobbying Law.学术倡导:在美国游说法下影响健康和科学政策的机会。
Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003037.
3
Health psychology and public policy: the political process.健康心理学与公共政策:政治进程。
Health Psychol. 1995 Nov;14(6):493-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.6.493.
4
The consequences of courage: the US Surgeon General, the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Trump regime.勇气的后果:美国卫生局局长、全国步枪协会(NRA)与特朗普政权
N Z Med J. 2017 Jun 16;130(1457):89-92.
5
Preemption in public health: the dynamics of clean indoor air laws.公共卫生中的优先适用:清洁室内空气法的动态变化
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Winter;31(4 Suppl):84-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00763.x.
6
"They just know": the epistemological politics of "evidence-based" non-formal education.“他们就是知道”:“基于证据的”非正规教育的认识论政治学。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:137-48. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
7
[The role of information in public health decision-making].[信息在公共卫生决策中的作用]
Sante Publique. 2008 Jul-Aug;20(4):387-94. doi: 10.3917/spub.084.0387.
8
From public health science to prevention policy: placing science in its social and political contexts.从公共卫生科学到预防政策:将科学置于其社会和政治背景之中。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1603-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1603.
9
Dollars, lobbying, and secrecy: how campaign contributions and lobbying affect public policy.美元、游说和保密:竞选捐款和游说如何影响公共政策。
Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(4):173-80. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2013-0500.
10
The primacy of politics: the rise and fall of evidence-based public health policy?政治的首要地位:循证公共卫生政策的兴衰?
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):486-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt113. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the "right@home" randomized trial of nurse home visiting using linked administrative data at school transition.在学校过渡阶段使用关联行政数据评估“居家适宜”护士家访随机试验。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 May 16;9(2):2400. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2400. eCollection 2024.
2
Population health and public health: Commonalities and differences.人群健康与公共卫生:共性与差异
J Public Health Dent. 2025 Mar;85(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12651. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile.布拉德福德更佳开端(BiBBS)干预性出生队列研究:中期队列概况。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:244. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2. eCollection 2022.
4
Nurse home visiting to improve child and maternal outcomes: 5-year follow-up of an Australian randomised controlled trial.护士家庭访视以改善儿童和产妇结局:澳大利亚一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0277773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277773. eCollection 2022.
5
Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power.研究人口健康和健康公平的就业质量:权力视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 13;19(16):9991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169991.
6
Shaping Pathways to Child Health: A Systematic Review of Street-Scale Interventions in City Streets.塑造儿童健康之路:城市街道中街头尺度干预的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;19(9):5227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095227.
7
A Systematic Review of Studies Describing the Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Potential Harms of Place-Based Interventions to Address Loneliness and Mental Health Problems.基于场所的干预措施解决孤独和心理健康问题的有效性、可接受性和潜在危害的研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084766.
8
Religion and Death in the United States: A Meta-Regression Comparative Assessment of Between-County Mortality Heterogeneity in the United States.宗教与美国的死亡:对美国县际死亡率异质性的元回归比较评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):757. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020757.
9
Trends in health equity in mortality in the United States, 1969-2019.1969 - 2019年美国死亡率方面的健康公平趋势
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Nov 18;16:100966. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100966. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Civilian Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense: Public Health, Stand Your Ground.民用致命武力自卫:公共卫生与坚守立场
Am J Public Health. 2021 Apr;111(4):559-561. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306173.

本文引用的文献

1
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Trends in Health Equity in the United States by Race/Ethnicity, Sex, and Income, 1993-2017.1993-2017 年美国按种族/民族、性别和收入划分的健康公平趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e196386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6386.
3
Contributions of Health Care to Longevity: A Review of 4 Estimation Methods.医疗保健对长寿的贡献:4 种估计方法的综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):267-272. doi: 10.1370/afm.2362.
4
Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.内生选择偏差:对撞机变量的条件设定问题。
Annu Rev Sociol. 2014 Jul;40:31-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Availability of evidence of benefits on overall survival and quality of life of cancer drugs approved by European Medicines Agency: retrospective cohort study of drug approvals 2009-13.欧洲药品管理局批准的癌症药物对总生存期和生活质量有益的证据可得性:2009 - 2013年药物批准情况的回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 4;359:j4530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4530.
6
Does water kill? A call for less casual causal inferences.水会致命吗?呼吁减少随意的因果推断。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Increasing public support for food-industry related, obesity prevention policies: The role of a taste-engineering frame and contextualized values.提高公众对与食品行业相关的肥胖预防政策的支持:味觉工程框架和情境化价值观的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;156:142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
County Health Rankings: Relationships Between Determinant Factors and Health Outcomes.县健康排名:决定因素与健康结果之间的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
9
The Strength of Association Between Surrogate End Points and Survival in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Trial-Level Meta-analyses.肿瘤学中替代终点与生存之间关联强度的系统评价:试验水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1389-98. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2829.
10
Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy.将儿童肥胖后果纳入考量框架,以增加公众对肥胖预防政策的支持。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):e96-102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301271. Epub 2013 Sep 12.