Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):514-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01660.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Understanding the spatial dimensions of hunting and prey population dynamics is important in order to estimate the sustainability of hunting in tropical forests. We investigated how hunting offtake of vertebrates differed in mixed forest and monodominant forest (composed of Gilbertiodendron dewevrei) and over different spatial extents within the hunting catchment around the logging town of Kabo, Congo. In 9 months of recall surveys with hunters, we gathered information on over 1500 hunting trips in which ungulates were 65% of the species killed and 82% of harvested biomass. Hunters supplied information on animals killed and the hunting trip, including the area visited (i.e., hunting zone; 11 separate zones within a 506 km(2) catchment or commonly hunted area). Over 65% of all animals were killed in monodominant forest, which made up 28% of the hunting catchment, and zones with small amounts of monodominant forest were used most frequently by hunters. Given the large offtakes from monodominant forests, we suggest that animal dispersal may be maintaining high, localized harvests in these areas. We believe hunters preferred to hunt in monodominant forest because the understory was accessible and that areas with small amounts of monodominant forest and large amounts of mixed forest were more productive. The variation in hunting pressure we found between and within hunting zones differs from past examinations of spatial variation in hunting offtake, where entire hunting catchments were considered population sinks and areas with low to no hunting (no-take zones) were outside hunting catchments. Future use of no-take zones to manage hunting should incorporate variability in offtake within hunting catchments.
了解狩猎和猎物种群动态的空间维度对于估计热带森林狩猎的可持续性非常重要。我们调查了混合林和单优势种林(由吉尔伯蒂奥登德伦木组成)中的脊椎动物狩猎收获量有何不同,并在刚果伐木小镇卡博周围的狩猎流域内不同的空间范围内进行了研究。在 9 个月的猎人流调中,我们收集了 1500 多次狩猎旅行的信息,其中有蹄类动物占所杀物种的 65%,收获的生物量占 82%。猎人提供了关于所杀动物和狩猎旅行的信息,包括访问的区域(即狩猎区;在 506 平方公里的流域或通常狩猎区有 11 个单独的区域)。超过 65%的动物是在单优势种林中被杀的,而单优势种林仅占狩猎流域的 28%,且只有少量单优势种林的区域最受猎人欢迎。鉴于从单优势种林中收获的大量动物,我们认为动物的扩散可能维持了这些地区高而局部的收获。我们认为猎人更喜欢在单优势种林中狩猎,因为林下植被是可进入的,而且单优势种林面积小且混合林面积大的区域生产力更高。我们在狩猎区之间和内部发现的狩猎压力变化与过去对狩猎收获空间变化的研究不同,在过去的研究中,整个狩猎流域被认为是种群汇,而低狩猎或无狩猎区(禁猎区)位于狩猎流域之外。未来使用禁猎区来管理狩猎时,应考虑到狩猎流域内收获的变化。