Jarvis Catherine, Munoz Marie, Graves Lisa, Stephenson Randolph, D'Souza Vinita, Jimenez Vania
Herzl Family Practice Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Mar;33(3):235-43. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34824-1.
To assess the adequacy of prenatal care and perinatal outcomes for uninsured pregnant women at two primary care centres in Canada.
We conducted a retrospective case comparison study of uninsured women presenting for prenatal care between 2004 and 2007 (n = 71). Control subjects (n = 72) were chosen from provincially insured women presenting for prenatal care during the same period. A modified Kotelchuck Index was used to assess adequacy of care. Frequency of routine prenatal testing (blood tests, ultrasound, cervical swabs, Pap testing, and genetic screening) was compared. Perinatal outcomes assessed included gestational age and birth weight.
Uninsured pregnant women presented for initial care 13.6 weeks later than insured women (at 25.6 weeks vs. 12.0 weeks, P < 0.001). Uninsured women had fewer blood tests (93.7% vs. 100%, P = 0.045), ultrasound screenings (82.5% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.003), cervical swabs (69.8% vs. 85.2%, P = 0.04), Pap tests (38.1% vs. 75.4%, P < 0.001), genetic screenings (12.7% vs. 44.3%, P < 0.001), and visits with health care providers (6.6 vs. 10.7, P = 0.05). Using a modified Kotelchuck Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index, uninsured women were more likely to be categorized as receiving "inadequate care" (uninsured 61.9% vs. insured 11.7%, P < 0.001).
This study begins to document the care of uninsured pregnant women in Canada. Women in this category presented late for prenatal care, were less likely to have adequate screening tests, and were more likely to receive "inadequate care" as defined by the modified Kotelchuck Index. This information may be valuable in helping to plan programs to improve access to timely and adequate medical care for uninsured pregnant women.
评估加拿大两个初级保健中心未参保孕妇的产前护理充分性及围产期结局。
我们对2004年至2007年间前来接受产前护理的未参保女性(n = 71)进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。对照对象(n = 72)选自同期前来接受产前护理的省级参保女性。使用改良的科特尔查克指数评估护理的充分性。比较常规产前检查(血液检查、超声检查、宫颈拭子检查、巴氏试验和基因筛查)的频率。评估的围产期结局包括孕周和出生体重。
未参保孕妇开始接受初次护理的时间比参保女性晚13.6周(分别为25.6周和12.0周,P < 0.001)。未参保女性进行血液检查的比例较低(93.7%对100%,P = 0.045)、超声筛查比例较低(82.5%对98.4%,P = 0.003)、宫颈拭子检查比例较低(69.8%对85.2%,P = 0.04)、巴氏试验比例较低(38.1%对75.4%,P < 0.001)、基因筛查比例较低(12.7%对44.3%,P < 0.001),且与医疗服务提供者的就诊次数较少(6.6次对10.7次,P = 0.05)。使用改良的产前护理利用充分性科特尔查克指数,未参保女性更有可能被归类为接受“不充分护理”(未参保者为61.9%,参保者为11.7%,P < 0.001)。
本研究开始记录加拿大未参保孕妇的护理情况。这类女性产前护理开始时间较晚,进行充分筛查检查的可能性较小,且按照改良的科特尔查克指数定义,更有可能接受“不充分护理”。这些信息对于帮助规划相关项目以改善未参保孕妇获得及时和充分医疗护理的机会可能具有重要价值。