Department of Earth Science, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 W. Michigan St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jan;184(2):845-75. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2005-y. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
Mechanistic hydrologic and water quality models provide useful alternatives for estimating water quality in unmonitored streams. However, developing these elaborate models for large watersheds can be time-consuming and expensive, in addition to challenges that arise during calibration when there is limited spatial and/or temporal monitored in-stream water quality data. The main objective of this research was to investigate different approaches for developing multivariate analysis models as alternative methods for rapidly assessing relationships between spatio-temporal physical attributes of the watershed and water quality conditions in monitored streams, and then using the developed relationships for estimating water quality conditions in unmonitored streams. The study compares the use of various statistical estimates (mean, geometric mean, trimmed mean, and median) of monitored water quality variables to represent annual and seasonal water quality conditions. The relationship between these estimates and the spatial data is then modeled via linear and non-linear multivariate methods. Overall, the non-linear techniques for classification outperformed the linear techniques with an average cross-validation accuracy of 79.7%. Additionally, the geometric mean based models outperformed models based on other statistical indicators with an average cross-validation accuracy of 80.2%. Dividing the data into annual and quarterly datasets also offered important insights into the behavior of certain water quality variables impacted by seasonal variations. The research provides useful guidance on the use and interpretation of the various statistical estimates and statistical models for multivariate water quality analyses.
机理水文水质模型为估算未监测溪流的水质提供了有用的替代方法。然而,为大型流域开发这些精细的模型既耗时又昂贵,此外,在进行校准时还会面临挑战,因为在监测到的溪流中,空间和/或时间水质数据有限。本研究的主要目的是研究不同的方法,以开发多元分析模型作为快速评估流域时空物理属性与监测溪流水质状况之间关系的替代方法,然后利用开发的关系来估算未监测溪流的水质状况。该研究比较了使用各种统计估计值(均值、几何均值、修剪均值和中位数)来表示年际和季节性水质条件的方法。然后,通过线性和非线性多元方法对这些估计值与空间数据之间的关系进行建模。总体而言,分类的非线性技术比线性技术表现更好,平均交叉验证准确性为 79.7%。此外,基于几何均值的模型比基于其他统计指标的模型表现更好,平均交叉验证准确性为 80.2%。将数据分为年度和季度数据集也为某些受季节性变化影响的水质变量的行为提供了重要的见解。该研究为多元水质分析中各种统计估计值和统计模型的使用和解释提供了有用的指导。