Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011 Oct;17(10):2184-91. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21702. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
The Institute of Medicine's publications, To Err is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm, publicized the widespread deficits in healthcare quality. The quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been comprehensively evaluated, in part due to a lack of well-established IBD measures of quality. Quality can be measured for evaluation, benchmarking, or continuous quality improvement, using structural, process, and outcome measures. Measurement is an essential component of the model for improvement, necessary to determine whether changes made have resulted in improvement. Measures used for quality improvement should be based on evidence and consensus, be clear and collectable in a timely fashion, occur with sufficient frequency, and have the potential to improve outcomes. While no current IBD measures of quality are perfect, an iterative process of measure development can produce a set of measures that are feasible, relevant, and useful for performing quality improvement. This review describes the history, rationale, and methods of quality measurement and discusses the early work and lessons learned from measuring quality of care in a pediatric IBD quality improvement collaborative.
医学研究所的出版物《犯错是人难免的》和《跨越质量鸿沟》宣传了医疗质量的广泛缺陷。炎症性肠病(IBD)的护理质量尚未得到全面评估,部分原因是缺乏成熟的 IBD 质量衡量标准。可以使用结构、过程和结果衡量标准来衡量质量,以进行评估、基准测试或持续质量改进。衡量是改进模型的一个基本组成部分,是确定所做的更改是否导致改进所必需的。用于质量改进的措施应基于证据和共识,应明确且能够及时收集,发生频率足够高,并有可能改善结果。虽然目前没有完美的 IBD 质量衡量标准,但可以通过迭代的措施开发过程来制定一套可行、相关且有助于进行质量改进的措施。这篇综述描述了质量衡量的历史、基本原理和方法,并讨论了在儿科 IBD 质量改进合作中衡量护理质量的早期工作和经验教训。