Ahmed Shahzad, Siegel Corey A, Melmed Gil Y
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Dr 2E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Apr;17(4):14. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0437-1.
Variation in care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is present across multiple aspects of IBD management, suggesting overall poor quality of care. Quality indicators are intended to provide clear, measurable processes and outcomes of quality care. Initial sets of process and outcome measures have been developed to address areas of inconsistent care and to allow for standardized measurement of outcomes. Measures developed by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) are intended to provide measurable standards for improvement in care. These measure sets will warrant updates overtime to best represent gaps in IBD management. Practically, implementation of quality measures may depend on the care setting and whether quality measurement and improvement can be incorporated into workflows and electronic medical records. Collaborative networks, utilization of care pathways, and standardized treatment algorithms may represent avenues for wide-scale implementation of quality improvement. Implementation efforts should assess the impact on outcomes in order to identify successful models for improvement in IBD care.
炎症性肠病(IBD)护理在IBD管理的多个方面存在差异,这表明整体护理质量较差。质量指标旨在提供清晰、可衡量的优质护理流程和结果。已制定了初始的流程和结果测量集,以解决护理不一致的领域,并实现结果的标准化测量。美国克罗恩病和结肠炎基金会(CCFA)制定的措施旨在为改善护理提供可衡量的标准。这些测量集将需要随着时间的推移进行更新,以最好地反映IBD管理中的差距。实际上,质量措施的实施可能取决于护理环境,以及质量测量和改进是否可以纳入工作流程和电子病历。协作网络、护理路径的利用和标准化治疗算法可能代表了大规模实施质量改进的途径。实施工作应评估对结果的影响,以确定改善IBD护理的成功模式。