Center for Health Economics & Science Policy, United BioSource Corporation , Lexington, MA , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jun;27(6):1131-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.570744. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
What is the relationship between average daily dose (ADD) of duloxetine, adherence to therapy, and healthcare costs among patients with fibromyalgia?
Employing a retrospective cohort design, this study assessed administrative claims data for commercially-insured fibromyalgia patients who initiated duloxetine in 2006. Initiation was defined as a 90-day clean period without access to duloxetine. Five study cohorts were constructed based on the ADD of duloxetine, calculated from all prescriptions dispensed over the 12-month follow-up period: <30 mg, 30 mg, 31-59 mg, 60 mg, and >60 mg (duloxetine starting dose: 30 mg/day; target dose: 60 mg/day). Medication possession ration (MPR) was used to assess duloxetine adherence, with MPR ≥0.8 as 'high' adherence. Multivariate regressions were applied to examine the association between ADD, duloxetine adherence, and healthcare costs (total, inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy), adjusting for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between cohorts.
Of the 4869 patients with fibromyalgia, 3% had an ADD of <30 mg, 12% had 30 mg, 21% had 31-59 mg, 46% had 60 mg, and 18% had >60 mg. High adherence to duloxetine ranged from 16% to 41% across cohorts. Controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients with an ADD of 31-59 mg or >60 mg were more likely to adhere to duloxetine therapy than those in the 60 mg cohort, while patients in the <30 mg cohort were less likely to adhere to duloxetine (all p < 0.05). Total costs were significantly higher for individuals in the 31-59 mg or >60 mg ADD cohorts ($1834 and $5766) than those maintaining an ADD of 60 mg, as were outpatient ($1167 and $2275) and pharmacy costs ($502 and $2983) (all p < 0.05). Patients with an ADD of 30 mg had significantly lower total (-$1770), inpatient (-$1524), and pharmacy (-$827) costs (all p < 0.05) than those with an ADD of 60 mg.
This study is subject to selection bias because some confounders might be unobserved in the administrative claims database. Indirect costs or over-the-counter medication costs were also not available.
Fibromyalgia patients with an ADD of 60 mg of duloxetine had better adherence than patients with an ADD ≤30 mg. Duloxetine patients with an ADD of 30 mg (31-59 or >60 mg) had significantly lower (higher) healthcare costs than those maintaining an ADD of 60 mg.
在纤维肌痛患者中,度洛西汀的平均日剂量(ADD)、治疗依从性与医疗保健成本之间存在何种关系?
本研究采用回顾性队列设计,评估了 2006 年接受度洛西汀治疗的商业保险纤维肌痛患者的行政索赔数据。起始治疗定义为在为期 12 个月的随访期间无度洛西汀用药的 90 天洗脱期。根据度洛西汀的 ADD 构建了五个研究队列:<30mg、30mg、31-59mg、60mg 和>60mg(度洛西汀起始剂量:30mg/天;目标剂量:60mg/天)。采用药物使用比例(MPR)评估度洛西汀的依从性,MPR≥0.8 为“高”依从性。采用多变量回归分析,调整队列间人口统计学和临床特征差异,考察 ADD、度洛西汀依从性与医疗保健成本(总费用、住院费用、门诊费用和药房费用)之间的关联。
在 4869 例纤维肌痛患者中,3%的患者 ADD<30mg、12%的患者 ADD 为 30mg、21%的患者 ADD 为 31-59mg、46%的患者 ADD 为 60mg、18%的患者 ADD>60mg。各队列间度洛西汀高依从性比例为 16%至 41%。在调整人口统计学和临床特征后,与 60mg 队列相比,31-59mg 或>60mg ADD 队列的患者更可能坚持度洛西汀治疗,而 30mg 队列的患者更不可能坚持度洛西汀治疗(均 P<0.05)。31-59mg 或>60mg ADD 队列的患者总费用(1834 美元和 5766 美元)显著高于 60mg ADD 队列,门诊费用(1167 美元和 2275 美元)和药房费用(502 美元和 2983 美元)也显著高于 60mg ADD 队列(均 P<0.05)。与 60mg ADD 队列相比,ADD 为 30mg 的患者总费用(-1770 美元)、住院费用(-1524 美元)和药房费用(-827 美元)显著降低(均 P<0.05)。
由于行政索赔数据库中可能存在一些未观察到的混杂因素,本研究存在选择偏倚。间接成本或非处方药物成本也不可用。
与 ADD≤30mg 的患者相比,ADD 为 60mg 的纤维肌痛患者具有更好的依从性。ADD 为 30mg(31-59mg 或>60mg)的度洛西汀患者的医疗保健成本显著低于维持 ADD 为 60mg 的患者。