White Craig, Kwong Winghan Jacqueline, Armstrong Hilary, Behling Michael, Niemira Jeffrey, Lang Kathy
Engagement Manager, IQVIA, New York, NY.
Executive Director, HEOR, Daiichi Sankyo, Basking Ridge, NJ.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Sep;11(6):293-301.
Fibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances that affects approximately 2% to 4% of the adult population in the United States, with minimal real-world data related to the use of medications and associated dosages for this condition.
To analyze the real-world dosing patterns of the 3 medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for fibromyalgia-pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran.
Using QuintilesIMS' (now IQVIA) electronic medical record data linked to administrative claims, we identified adults with fibromyalgia who were newly prescribed pregabalin, duloxetine, or milnacipran between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014. We summarized and compared the starting and maximum doses with United States prescribing information (USPI) dosing recommendations.
In all, 1043 patients who were receiving pregabalin, 1281 receiving duloxetine, and 326 patients receiving milnacipran with similar age and comorbidity profiles were included in the study. The mean starting dose was 176 mg daily, 56 mg daily, and 95 mg daily for pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran, respectively. More patients receiving pregabalin (35%) had a starting dose lower than recommended compared with patients receiving duloxetine (7%) or milnacipran (17%; <.0001). Of the patients who received pregabalin, 27% had USPI-recommended maintenance dosing versus 91% of patients who received duloxetine and 80% who received milnacipran ( <.0001). The mean duration of treatment was longer for duloxetine (205 days; <.0001) than for pregabalin (167 days) and milnacipran (167 days). The duration of using the maximum dose of each medication as a percentage of the total time of medication use was 77% for pregabalin, 84% for duloxetine, and 90% for milnacipran ( <.0001).
Patients using pregabalin were the most likely of the 3 cohorts to receive lower than label-recommended starting doses and the least likely to receive the recommended maintenance doses during follow-up compared with those receiving duloxetine or milnacipran. Real-world prescribing patterns indicate that factors other than label recommendations may be influencing prescribed dosing.
纤维肌痛是一种慢性疾病,其特征为广泛疼痛、疲劳和睡眠障碍,在美国约2%至4%的成年人口中受到影响,而关于该疾病用药及相关剂量的实际数据极少。
分析美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于治疗纤维肌痛的三种药物——普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那普明的实际给药模式。
利用昆泰公司(现IQVIA)与行政索赔相关联的电子病历数据,我们确定了在2006年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间新开具普瑞巴林、度洛西汀或米那普明处方的成年纤维肌痛患者。我们总结并比较了起始剂量和最大剂量与美国处方信息(USPI)给药建议。
该研究共纳入了1043例接受普瑞巴林治疗的患者、1281例接受度洛西汀治疗的患者以及326例接受米那普明治疗的患者,这些患者的年龄和合并症情况相似。普瑞巴林、度洛西汀和米那普明的平均起始剂量分别为每日176毫克、每日56毫克和每日95毫克。与接受度洛西汀(7%)或米那普明(17%;P<.0001)的患者相比,更多接受普瑞巴林治疗的患者(35%)起始剂量低于推荐剂量。在接受普瑞巴林治疗的患者中,27%的患者采用了USPI推荐的维持剂量,而接受度洛西汀治疗的患者这一比例为91%,接受米那普明治疗的患者为80%(P<.0001)。度洛西汀的平均治疗持续时间(205天;P<.0001)比普瑞巴林(167天)和米那普明(167天)更长。每种药物最大剂量使用时间占总用药时间的百分比,普瑞巴林为77%,度洛西汀为84%,米那普明为90%(P<.0001)。
与接受度洛西汀或米那普明治疗的患者相比,使用普瑞巴林的患者在三组中最有可能接受低于标签推荐的起始剂量,且在随访期间接受推荐维持剂量的可能性最小。实际处方模式表明,除标签推荐外的其他因素可能会影响处方剂量。