Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):662-72. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.611060. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
To examine healthcare cost patterns prior to and following duloxetine initiation in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), focusing on patients initiated at or titrated to high doses.
Retrospective analysis of 10,987 outpatients, aged 18-64 years, who were enrolled in health insurance for 6 months preceding and 12 months following duloxetine initiation.
Repeated measures and pre-post analyses were used to examine healthcare cost trajectories before and after initiation of low- (<60 mg/day), standard- (60 mg/day), and high-dose (>60 mg/day) duloxetine therapy. Decision tree analysis was used to identify patient characteristics that might explain heterogeneity in economic outcomes following titration to high-dose therapy.
Low-, standard-, and high-dose duloxetine were initiated for 29.6%, 60.9%, and 9.5% of patients, respectively. Within 6 months, 13.7% of patients had dose increases to > 60 mg/day. Regardless of dose, total costs increased prior to and decreased following initiation of treatment. The High Initial Dose Cohort had higher costs both prior to and throughout treatment compared to the other two cohorts. Following escalation to > 60 mg/day, higher medication costs were balanced by lower inpatient costs. Titration to high-dose therapy was cost-beneficial for patients with histories of a mental disorder in addition to MDD and higher prior medical costs.
Conclusions are limited by a lack of supporting clinical information and may not apply to patients who are not privately insured.
In data taken from insured patients with MDD who were started on duloxetine in a clinical setting, healthcare costs increased prior to and decreased following initiation of therapy. Compared to patients initiated at low- and standard-doses, costs were greater prior to and following initiation for patients initiated at high doses. Increases in pharmacy costs associated with escalation to high-dose therapy were offset by reduced inpatient expenses.
研究接受度洛西汀治疗的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者治疗前及治疗后的医疗费用模式,重点关注起始或滴定至高剂量的患者。
对 10987 名年龄在 18-64 岁之间的门诊患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者在接受度洛西汀治疗前的 6 个月和治疗后的 12 个月内均参加了医疗保险。
采用重复测量和前后比较分析,考察了低剂量(<60mg/d)、标准剂量(60mg/d)和高剂量(>60mg/d)度洛西汀治疗前和治疗后的医疗费用轨迹。采用决策树分析来确定可能解释滴定至高剂量治疗后经济结局异质性的患者特征。
低、标准和高剂量度洛西汀分别起始于 29.6%、60.9%和 9.5%的患者。在 6 个月内,13.7%的患者剂量增加至>60mg/d。无论剂量如何,在治疗开始前和治疗开始后总费用均增加。与其他两个队列相比,高初始剂量队列在治疗前和整个治疗过程中的费用都更高。升高至>60mg/d后,较高的药物费用被较低的住院费用所抵消。对于除 MDD 以外还患有精神障碍病史和先前医疗费用较高的患者,滴定至高剂量治疗具有成本效益。
由于缺乏支持性临床信息,结论受到限制,并且可能不适用于未参加私人保险的患者。
在从临床环境开始接受度洛西汀治疗的 MDD 保险患者数据中,治疗前和治疗后医疗费用均增加。与起始低剂量和标准剂量的患者相比,起始高剂量的患者在治疗前和治疗后开始时的费用更高。与升高至高剂量治疗相关的药物费用增加被减少的住院费用所抵消。