• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Particulate emission factors for mobile fossil fuel and biomass combustion sources.移动化石燃料和生物质燃烧源的颗粒物排放因子。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 May 15;409(12):2384-96. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.041. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
2
Remote sensing of PM, NO, CO and HC emission factors for on-road gasoline and diesel engine vehicles in Las Vegas, NV.内华达州拉斯维加斯市道路上汽油和柴油发动机车辆的PM、NO、CO和HC排放因子的遥感监测
Sci Total Environ. 2004 Apr 25;322(1-3):123-37. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.09.013.
3
Concentrations of air toxics in motor vehicle-dominated environments.机动车主导环境中的空气有毒物质浓度。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Feb(156):3-77.
4
Temperature effects on particulate matter emissions from light-duty, gasoline-powered motor vehicles.温度对轻型汽油动力机动车颗粒物排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jun 15;44(12):4672-7. doi: 10.1021/es100219q.
5
Contribution of lubricating oil to particulate matter emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles in Kansas City.堪萨斯城轻型汽油车颗粒物排放中润滑油的贡献。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Apr 3;46(7):4191-9. doi: 10.1021/es203747f. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
6
Real-world particulate matter and gaseous emissions from motor vehicles in a highway tunnel.公路隧道中机动车的实际颗粒物和气态排放
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2002 Jan(107):5-56; discussion 79-92.
7
PM₂.₅ emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles in Beijing, China.中国北京轻型汽油车的 PM₂.₅ 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jul 15;487:521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.059. Epub 2014 May 6.
8
Methods of characterizing the distribution of exhaust emissions from light-duty, gasoline-powered motor vehicles in the U.S. fleet.描述美国车队中轻型汽油动力机动车尾气排放分布特征的方法。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010 Nov;60(11):1376-87. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.11.1376.
9
A case study of real-world tailpipe emissions for school buses using a 20% biodiesel blend.一项关于使用20%生物柴油混合物的校车实际尾气排放的案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Oct 15;385(1-3):146-59. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
10
Effects of retrofitting emission control systems on in-use heavy diesel vehicles. retrofit 排放控制系统对在用重型柴油车的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;44(13):5042-8. doi: 10.1021/es1006669.

引用本文的文献

1
Household Fuel Use and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Golestan Cohort Study.家庭燃料使用与心血管疾病死亡率:戈勒斯坦队列研究
Circulation. 2016 Jun 14;133(24):2360-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020288.
2
Emission of metals from pelletized and uncompressed biomass fuels combustion in rural household stoves in China.中国农村家用炉灶中颗粒状和未压缩生物质燃料燃烧产生的金属排放。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 8;4:5611. doi: 10.1038/srep05611.
3
Disparities in exposure to automobile and truck traffic and vehicle emissions near the Los Angeles-Long Beach port complex.洛杉矶-长滩港附近汽车和卡车交通及车辆排放的暴露差异。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jan;104(1):156-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301120. Epub 2013 May 16.

移动化石燃料和生物质燃烧源的颗粒物排放因子。

Particulate emission factors for mobile fossil fuel and biomass combustion sources.

机构信息

Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, United States.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2011 May 15;409(12):2384-96. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.041. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.041
PMID:21458027
Abstract

PM emission factors (EFs) for gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles and biomass combustion were measured in several recent studies. In the Gas/Diesel Split Study (GD-Split), PM(2.5) EFs for heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDV) ranged from 0.2 to ~2 g/mile and increased with vehicle age. EFs for HDDV estimated with the U.S. EPA MOBILE 6.2 and California Air Resources Board (ARB) EMFAC2007 models correlated well with measured values. PM(2.5) EFs measured for gasoline vehicles were ~two orders of magnitude lower than those for HDDV and did not correlate with model estimates. In the Kansas City Study, PM(2.5) EFs for gasoline-powered vehicles (e.g., passenger cars and light trucks) were generally <0.03 g/mile and were higher in winter than summer. EMFAC2007 reported higher PM(2.5) EFs than MOBILE 6.2 during winter, but not during summer, and neither model captured the variability of the measured EFs. Total PM EFs for heavy-duty diesel military vehicles ranged from 0.18±0.03 and 1.20±0.12 g/kg fuel, corresponding to 0.3 and 2 g/mile, respectively. These values are comparable to those of on-road HDDV. EFs for biomass burning measured during the Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiment (FLAME) were compared with EFs from the ARB Emission Estimation System (EES) model. The highest PM(2.5) EFs (76.8±37.5 g/kg) were measured for wet (>50% moisture content) Ponderosa Pine needles. EFs were generally <20 g/kg when moisture content was <20%. The EES model agreed with measured EFs for fuels with low moisture content but underestimated measured EFs for fuel with moisture content >40%. Average EFs for dry chamise, rice straw, and dry grass were within a factor of three of values adopted by ARB in California's San Joaquin Valley (SJV). Discrepancies between measured and modeled emission factors suggest that there may be important uncertainties in current PM(2.5) emission inventories.

摘要

在最近的几项研究中,测量了汽油和柴油燃料车辆以及生物质燃烧的 PM 排放因子 (EF)。在 Gas/Diesel Split Study (GD-Split) 中,重型柴油车辆 (HDDV) 的 PM(2.5)EF 范围为 0.2 至 ~2 g/英里,并随车辆年龄的增长而增加。使用美国 EPA MOBILE 6.2 和加利福尼亚空气资源委员会 (ARB) EMFAC2007 模型估算的 HDDV 的 EF 与实测值相关性良好。测量的汽油车辆的 PM(2.5)EF 低 ~2 个数量级,与模型估算值不相关。在堪萨斯城研究中,汽油动力车辆(例如乘用车和轻型卡车)的 PM(2.5)EF 通常 <0.03 g/英里,冬季高于夏季。冬季 EMFAC2007 报告的 PM(2.5)EF 高于 MOBILE 6.2,但夏季并非如此,而且两个模型都无法捕捉到实测 EF 的可变性。重型柴油军用车辆的总 PM EF 范围为 0.18±0.03 和 1.20±0.12 g/kg 燃料,分别对应 0.3 和 2 g/英里。这些值与道路上的 HDDV 相当。在 Missoula Experiment 的 Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiment (FLAME) 测量的生物质燃烧 EF 与 ARB Emission Estimation System (EES) 模型的 EF 进行了比较。湿 (>50%水分含量) 狐尾松针叶的 PM(2.5)EF 最高 (76.8±37.5 g/kg)。当水分含量 <20%时,EF 通常 <20 g/kg。EES 模型与低水分含量燃料的实测 EF 一致,但低估了水分含量 >40%的燃料的实测 EF。干 Chamise、稻秸和干草的平均 EF 与 ARB 在加利福尼亚圣华金谷 (SJV) 采用的值相差一个数量级。实测和模型化排放因子之间的差异表明,当前 PM(2.5)排放清单可能存在重要的不确定性。