MGH/MIT/HMS A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital-East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA O2129, USA.
Brain Res. 2011 May 25;1392:110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.060. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
We sought to investigate the effect of cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on cerebral blood flow (CBF), infarct volume, and clinical outcome in a model of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Electrical stimulation of the right and left vagus nerves was initiated 30min after the induction of the right-sided ischemia and lasted for 1h. Infarct size measurement revealed that the volume of ischemic damage was 41-45% smaller in animals receiving stimulation as compared with control animals. Both the right and left VNS caused subtle reduction in CBF during each 30-s stimulation period that quickly returned back to the baseline level at the end of each stimulation cycle. There was no significant effect of VNS on CBF during the entire 1-h stimulation period. The effect of VNS on tissue outcome was associated with better neurological outcome at both 1- and 3-day time points after the induction of ischemia. These findings suggest that VNS-induced protection against acute ischemic brain injury is not primarily mediated by changes in CBF, stimulation of both the right and left nerve have comparable effects, and VNS is effective after ipsilateral and contralateral focal ischemia.
我们旨在研究迷走神经刺激(VNS)对大脑血流(CBF)、梗死体积和大鼠大脑中动脉闭塞模型中临床结果的影响。右侧缺血诱导后 30 分钟开始对右侧和左侧迷走神经进行电刺激,持续 1 小时。梗死大小测量显示,与对照组相比,接受刺激的动物的缺血损伤体积缩小了 41-45%。右侧和左侧 VNS 在每次 30 秒刺激期间均导致 CBF 略有降低,每个刺激周期结束时迅速恢复到基线水平。整个 1 小时刺激期间,VNS 对 CBF 没有显著影响。VNS 对组织结果的影响与缺血诱导后 1 天和 3 天的神经功能预后改善相关。这些发现表明,VNS 诱导的急性缺血性脑损伤保护作用不是主要通过 CBF 变化介导的,刺激右侧和左侧神经的效果相当,并且同侧和对侧局灶性缺血后 VNS 均有效。