Suppr超能文献

急性特发性颈痛的预后较差:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prognosis of acute idiopathic neck pain is poor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.025. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognosis of acute idiopathic neck pain and disability.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, AMED, PEDro, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to July 2009, limited to human studies. Reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were searched by hand. Search terms included: neck pain, prognosis, inception, cohort, longitudinal, observational, or prospective study and randomized controlled trial.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were longitudinal cohort studies and randomized controlled trials with a no treatment or minimal treatment arm that recruited an inception cohort of acute idiopathic neck pain and reported pain or disability outcomes. Eligibility was determined by 2 authors independently. Seven of 20,085 references were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pain and disability data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Risk of bias was assessed independently by 2 authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Statistical pooling showed a weighted mean pain score (0-100) of 64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 61-67) at onset and 35 (95% CI, 32-38) at 6.5 weeks. At 12 months, neck pain severity remained high at 42 (95% CI, 39-45). Disability reduced from a pooled weighted mean score (0-100) at onset of 30 (95% CI, 28-32) to 17 (95% CI, 15-19) by 6.5 weeks, without further improvement at 12 months. Studies varied in length of follow-up, design, and sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides Level I evidence that the prognosis of acute idiopathic neck pain is worse than currently recognized. This evidence can guide primary care clinicians when providing prognostic information to patients. Further research to identify prognostic factors and long-term outcomes from inception cohorts would be valuable.

摘要

目的

对急性特发性颈痛和残疾的预后进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

资料来源

从建库至 2009 年 7 月,在 EMBASE、CINAHL、Medline、AMED、PEDro 和 CENTRAL 中进行了检索,限定为人类研究。手工检索了相关系统评价的参考文献列表。检索词包括:颈痛、预后、起始、队列、纵向、观察性或前瞻性研究和随机对照试验。

研究选择

符合条件的研究为具有无治疗或最小治疗组的纵向队列研究和随机对照试验,招募了急性特发性颈痛的起始队列,并报告了疼痛或残疾结局。由 2 位作者独立确定合格性。从 20085 篇参考文献中筛选出 7 篇。

资料提取

2 位作者独立提取疼痛和残疾数据。2 位作者独立评估偏倚风险。

资料综合

统计汇总显示,起始时的加权平均疼痛评分(0-100)为 64(95%置信区间[CI],61-67),6.5 周时为 35(95% CI,32-38)。12 个月时,颈痛严重程度仍较高,为 42(95% CI,39-45)。残疾程度从起始时的加权平均评分(0-100)30(95% CI,28-32)下降至 6.5 周时的 17(95% CI,15-19),12 个月时无进一步改善。研究在随访时间、设计和样本量上存在差异。

结论

本综述提供了 I 级证据,表明急性特发性颈痛的预后比目前认识的更差。这一证据可以指导初级保健临床医生在向患者提供预后信息时提供参考。进一步研究识别起始队列的预后因素和长期结局将是有价值的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验