• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员使用缩写词:未来的路在何方?

Use of abbreviations by healthcare professionals: what is the way forward?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Torbay Hospital, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2011 Jul;87(1029):450-2. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.097394. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2010.097394
PMID:21459778
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the understanding of commonly used abbreviations in the medical records among healthcare professionals.

METHODS

A selection of abbreviations from surgical inpatient admissions (gathered over a 10 day period in October 2008), in the form of a standard questionnaire, was shown to different members of a multidisciplinary team to examine interpretation and knowledge.

RESULTS

209 questionnaires were analysed. The average correct response was 43%. Foundation Year 1 (F1) doctors scored the highest with 57% correct responses, whereas dieticians fared worst (20% correct). Among different abbreviations, NAD (91%) and SCBU (93%) were most often correctly answered, whereas CIC (3%) and STS (0.5%) were the most incorrectly answered. Certain abbreviations which are mostly used by nurses (eg, OTT) achieved a 75% correct response by them compared to only 11% by F1 and 10% by F2 doctors (p<0.001). Similarly, abbreviations such as COBH (p=0.025) and LUTS (p<0.001), although mostly correctly answered by junior doctors, were very poorly answered by nurses.

CONCLUSION

The majority of healthcare professionals have a very poor knowledge of commonly used abbreviations. Use of unambiguous and approved list of abbreviations is suggested in order to ensure good communication in patient care.

摘要

目的

评估医疗保健专业人员对病历中常用缩写的理解。

方法

以标准问卷的形式,向多学科团队的不同成员展示了 2008 年 10 月为期 10 天的外科住院患者中收集的缩写,以检查其解释和知识。

结果

共分析了 209 份问卷。平均正确反应率为 43%。第一年住院医师(F1)得分最高,正确回答率为 57%,而营养师得分最差(20%正确)。在不同的缩写中,NAD(91%)和 SCBU(93%)最常正确回答,而 CIC(3%)和 STS(0.5%)则最不正确。护士常用的某些缩写(例如 OTT),护士的正确回答率为 75%,而 F1 和 F2 医生的正确回答率仅为 11%和 10%(p<0.001)。同样,虽然初级医生大多正确回答了 COBH(p=0.025)和 LUTS(p<0.001)等缩写,但护士的回答却很差。

结论

大多数医疗保健专业人员对常用缩写的了解非常有限。建议使用明确且经批准的缩写列表,以确保在患者护理中进行良好的沟通。

相似文献

1
Use of abbreviations by healthcare professionals: what is the way forward?医护人员使用缩写词:未来的路在何方?
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Jul;87(1029):450-2. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.097394. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
2
The use of abbreviations in medical records in a multidisciplinary world--an imminent disaster.在多学科环境下医疗记录中使用缩写——一场即将到来的灾难。
Commun Med. 2008;5(1):25-33. doi: 10.1558/cam.v5i1.25.
3
Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping.含义不明确的缩写:儿科病历记录中缩写的审查
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Mar;93(3):204-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.128132. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
4
Abbreviations: the need for legibility and accuracy in documentation.缩写:文档记录中对易读性和准确性的要求。
Br J Nurs. 2005;14(12):665-6. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.12.18289.
5
A descriptive study of the knowledge of nurses and doctors of clinical abbreviations in hospital discharge reports.一项关于护士和医生对出院报告中临床缩写知识的描述性研究。
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep-Oct;29(5):302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Use of abbreviations in daily progress notes.日常病程记录中缩写的使用。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jul;89(4):F374. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.045591.
7
Computing knowledge, attitude and skills among healthcare professionals in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.尼日利亚阿米努·卡诺教学医院医护人员的计算机知识、态度和技能
Niger J Med. 2005 Apr-Jun;14(2):200-5.
8
Use of medical abbreviations and acronyms: knowledge among medical students and postgraduates.医学缩写和首字母缩略词的使用:医学生和研究生的知识。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Dec;92(1094):721-725. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134086. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Development of a waste management protocol based on assessment of knowledge and practice of healthcare personnel in surgical departments.基于对外科部门医护人员知识与实践评估制定废物管理方案。
Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
10
A study on the use of abbreviations among doctors and nurses in the medical department of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级医院内科医生和护士使用缩写词的研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2015 Dec;70(6):334-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Auto-expansion software prompting reduces abbreviation use in electronic hospital discharge letters: an observational pre- and post-intervention study.自动扩展软件提示可减少电子出院小结中的缩写使用:一项干预前后的观察性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 1;25(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03005-8.
2
Interpretation and Misinterpretation of Medical Abbreviations Found in Patient Medical Records: A Cross-Sectional Survey.患者病历中医学缩写的解读与误读:一项横断面调查。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44735. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44735. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Evaluating the Impact on Clinical Task Efficiency of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Searching Medical Documents: Prospective Crossover Study.
评估用于搜索医学文献的自然语言处理算法对临床任务效率的影响:前瞻性交叉研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Oct 26;10(10):e39616. doi: 10.2196/39616.
4
Disambiguating Clinical Abbreviations Using a One-Fits-All Classifier Based on Deep Learning Techniques.基于深度学习技术的一刀切分类器在临床缩写中的应用。
Methods Inf Med. 2022 Jun;61(S 01):e28-e34. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742388. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Use of abbreviations in consent forms for orthopaedic surgery: A pilot study.骨科手术同意书中缩写词的使用:一项试点研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 15;71:102949. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102949. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
An audit of consenting practices in a district general hospital. Can we improve?对一家区综合医院同意程序的审计。我们能改进吗?
G Chir. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):263-6. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.6.263.
7
Consenting operative orthopaedic trauma patients: challenges and solutions.同意接受手术治疗的骨科创伤患者:挑战与解决方案
ISRN Surg. 2014 Feb 6;2014:354239. doi: 10.1155/2014/354239. eCollection 2014.