Department of Community Paediatrics, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Jan;97(1):73-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.186668. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
Child health surveillance (CHS) has evolved greatly over the past 30 years from a proactive screening process by health professionals to a more passive approach of child health promotion (CHP), which places the main responsibility for detection of developmental problems on carers. The impetus for this change came from the Hall Report (1989), which reported a lack of evidence for CHS. Although research on developmental screening is sparse, some data show that use of structured methods for identifying deviations from normal increases the pick-up rate of abnormalities, compared with informal or parent-initiated methods. The majority of countries recommend a universal 'CHS' type of programme, in contrast to the UK and some other European countries. Alternatives to universal CHS include 'targeting' which, however, has been criticised for including too many 'normal' children and missing those who are most in need. CHS and CHP are basically primary care activities but require essential support from secondary paediatric services. There are concerns about the competence and numbers of general practitioners and health visitors who deliver child healthcare. Both these professional groups are under great pressure because of continuing reorganisations of the National Health Service in the UK. Politically driven agendae complicate the fundamental aim of enhancing child health at the primary level and it is vital to keep the focus on providing high-quality services to the most needy children. CHS has evolved beyond CHP to a Healthy Child Programme (HCP). Hopefully this is not an 'emperor's new clothes' situation and will improve outcomes. A major problem is the 'inverse care law', and reliance on carers runs the risk of excluding those children who need most input. Inequality is currently a headline problem and the change from CHS to HCP may not have helped. More research is urgently needed to resolve uncertainty about the application of these fundamental procedures for secondary preventive of childhood disability.
儿童健康监测(CHS)在过去 30 年中发生了很大的变化,从卫生专业人员的主动筛查过程演变为更被动的儿童健康促进(CHP)方法,将发现发育问题的主要责任放在照顾者身上。这种变化的动力来自 Hall 报告(1989 年),该报告表明缺乏 CHS 的证据。尽管发育筛查方面的研究很少,但一些数据表明,与非结构化或家长发起的方法相比,使用结构化方法识别正常偏差可提高异常的检出率。与英国和其他一些欧洲国家不同,大多数国家推荐采用普遍的“CHS”型方案。替代普遍 CHS 的方案包括“靶向”,但它因包括太多“正常”儿童和错过最需要的儿童而受到批评。CHS 和 CHP 基本上是初级保健活动,但需要二级儿科服务的必要支持。人们对提供儿童保健的全科医生和健康访问者的能力和数量表示关注。由于英国国民保健制度持续重组,这两个专业群体都承受着巨大的压力。受政治驱动的议程使在初级保健层面上增强儿童健康的基本目标变得复杂,因此,必须将重点放在为最需要的儿童提供高质量的服务上。CHS 已经从 CHP 发展到了健康儿童计划(HCP)。希望这不是一种“皇帝的新衣”的情况,并能改善结果。一个主要问题是“逆向医疗保健定律”,依赖照顾者可能会使那些最需要投入的儿童被排除在外。不平等目前是一个突出的问题,从 CHS 到 HCP 的转变可能没有帮助。迫切需要更多的研究来解决对这些用于儿童残疾二级预防的基本程序的应用的不确定性。