Maric Marija, Heyne David A, van Widenfelt Brigit M, Westenberg P Michiel
Cognit Ther Res. 2011 Feb;35(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s10608-009-9285-3. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
The Children's Negative Cognitive Error Questionnaire (CNCEQ) is commonly used to measure four errors in young people's thinking, but research has failed to support the factorial validity of the measure. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the factor structure of a refined and extended version of the CNCEQ. Revision of the CNCEQ involved the exclusion of items rated as contaminated, and the addition of items measuring cognitive errors closely associated with anxiety ('threat conclusion' and 'underestimation of the ability to cope'). A secondary objective was to determine the relation between the negative cognitive errors and anxiety. Principal component analysis of data from 481 children and adolescents indicated five distinct negative cognitive error subscales labeled 'underestimation of the ability to cope', 'personalizing without mind reading', 'selective abstraction', 'overgeneralizing', and 'mind reading' which contained the new 'threat conclusion' items. Confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample of 295 children and adolescents yielded further support for the five-factor solution. All cognitive errors except 'selective abstraction' were correlated with anxiety. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the strongest predictors of anxiety were the two subscales containing new items, namely 'underestimation of the ability to cope' and 'mind reading'. The results are discussed with respect to further development of the instrument so as to advance the assessment of distorted cognitive processing in young people with internalizing symptoms.
儿童消极认知错误问卷(CNCEQ)通常用于测量青少年思维中的四种错误,但研究未能支持该测量工具的因素效度。本研究的主要目的是检验CNCEQ的一个经过完善和扩展版本的因素结构。对CNCEQ的修订包括排除被评为受污染的项目,以及增加测量与焦虑密切相关的认知错误的项目(“威胁结论”和“应对能力低估”)。第二个目的是确定消极认知错误与焦虑之间的关系。对481名儿童和青少年的数据进行主成分分析,结果显示有五个不同的消极认知错误子量表,分别标记为“应对能力低估”、“不读心的个人化”、“选择性抽象”、“过度概括”和“读心”,其中包含新的“威胁结论”项目。在295名儿童和青少年的独立样本中进行验证性因素分析,进一步支持了五因素解决方案。除“选择性抽象”外,所有认知错误都与焦虑相关。多元回归分析表明,焦虑的最强预测因素是包含新项目的两个子量表,即“应对能力低估”和“读心”。针对该测量工具的进一步发展对结果进行了讨论,以便推进对有内化症状的青少年扭曲认知加工的评估。