• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结肠切除术的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.

机构信息

Marco Braga, Nicolò Pecorelli, Matteo Frasson, Andrea Vignali, Walter Zuliani, Valerio Di Carlo, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011 Mar 15;3(3):43-8. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i3.43.

DOI:10.4251/wjgo.v3.i3.43
PMID:21461168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3069309/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate long-term outcomes in a large series of patients who randomly received laparoscopic or open colorectal resection.

METHODS

From February 2000 to December 2004, six hundred sixty-two patients with colorectal disease were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (LPS, n = 330) or open (n = 332) colorectal resection. All patients were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Long-term follow-up was carried out every 6 mo by office visits. In 526 cancer patients five-year overall and disease-free survival were evaluated. Median oncologic follow-up was 96 mo.

RESULTS

Eight (4.2%) LPS group patients needed conversion to open surgery. Overall long-term morbidity rate was 7.6% (25/330) in the LPS vs 11.1% (37/332) in the open group (P = 0.17). In cancer patients, five-year overall survival was 68.6% in the LPS group and 64.0% in the Open group (P = 0.27). Excluding stage IV patients, five-year local and distant recurrence rates were 32.5% in the LPS group and 36.8% in the Open group (P = 0.36). Further, no difference in recurrence rate was found when patients were stratified according to cancer stage.

CONCLUSION

LPS colorectal resection was associated with a slightly lower incidence of long-term complications than open surgery. No difference between groups was found in overall and disease-free survival rates.

摘要

目的

评估一组随机接受腹腔镜或开腹结直肠切除术的患者的长期结果。

方法

从 2000 年 2 月至 2004 年 12 月,662 例结直肠疾病患者被随机分配接受腹腔镜(LPS,n = 330)或开腹(n = 332)结直肠切除术。所有患者均进行意向治疗分析。通过门诊随访进行长期随访,每 6 个月进行一次。在 526 例癌症患者中,评估了 5 年的总生存率和无病生存率。中位肿瘤随访时间为 96 个月。

结果

LPS 组有 8 例(4.2%)患者需要转为开腹手术。LPS 组的总体长期发病率为 7.6%(25/330),开腹组为 11.1%(37/332)(P = 0.17)。在癌症患者中,LPS 组的 5 年总生存率为 68.6%,开腹组为 64.0%(P = 0.27)。排除 IV 期患者后,LPS 组和开腹组的 5 年局部和远处复发率分别为 32.5%和 36.8%(P = 0.36)。此外,根据癌症分期对患者进行分层后,复发率无差异。

结论

LPS 结直肠切除术与开腹手术相比,长期并发症的发生率略低。两组患者的总生存率和无病生存率无差异。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy.腹腔镜结肠切除术的长期结果。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011 Mar 15;3(3):43-8. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i3.43.
2
Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后的十年预后:一项随机对照试验的结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;31(7):1283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2587-5. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival.癌症患者的腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术:长期并发症、生活质量和生存率
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Dec;48(12):2217-23. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0185-7.
4
Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.十年间腹腔镜与开放手术切除结直肠癌的前瞻性比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):601-11. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6616-z.
5
A single surgeon's experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely?一名外科医生连续 54 例局部晚期原发性结直肠癌多脏器切除术的经验:腹腔镜方法是否可以安全实施?
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1907-7. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
7
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
8
Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial.高容量外科中心的腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:LAPCOLON 组试验的长期结果
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3050-4.
9
Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的长期生存:完整的五年随访
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Apr;45(4):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6227-8.
10
Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome.腹腔镜手术治疗老年结直肠癌患者的优势,不影响肿瘤学结果。
BMC Surg. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00967-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Resection Can Reduce the Inhibition of Immune Function Compared with Conventional Open Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Study.腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术与传统开放手术相比可减轻对免疫功能的抑制:一项回顾性临床研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2320. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062320.
2
An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.在标准缝合的结直肠手术中,切口疝风险的证据图谱和综合分析综述及荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):411-436. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02555-w. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer.倾向评分匹配分析腹腔镜与开放手术治疗非转移性直肠癌的效果。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):3967-3975. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3967.
4
Clinicopathologic parameters associated with postoperative complications and risk factors for tumor recurrence and mortality after tumor resection of patients with colorectal cancer.与结直肠癌患者肿瘤切除术后并发症相关的临床病理参数,以及肿瘤复发和死亡的危险因素。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Feb;20(2):176-192. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1708-0. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
Lymph node assessment in colorectal cancer surgery: laparoscopic versus open techniques.结直肠癌手术中的淋巴结评估:腹腔镜技术与开放技术对比
G Chir. 2017 Jan-Feb;38(1):23-26. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2017.38.1.023.
6
An evidence-based medicine approach to the laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer.基于循证医学的腹腔镜结直肠癌治疗方法。
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2016 Dec 16;62(2):74-82. doi: 10.5387/fms.2016-4. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
7
Small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative trials.腹腔镜与开放结直肠手术后的小肠梗阻和切口疝:比较试验的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4995-6. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
8
Incisional Hernia Rates After Laparoscopic or Open Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜或开腹手术后切口疝发生率——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2319-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3.
9
Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery.腹腔镜直肠切除术转为开放手术的术前预测:腹腔镜直肠切除术转为开放手术转换评分的临床研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1209-16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2275-x. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Disparities in the Utilization of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer in Rural Nebraska: A Call for Placement and Training of Rural General Surgeons.内布拉斯加州农村地区结肠癌腹腔镜手术应用的差异:呼吁安置和培训农村普通外科医生。
J Rural Health. 2015 Fall;31(4):392-400. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12120. Epub 2015 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.腹腔镜与开腹左半结肠切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094.
2
Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial.CLASICC试验中腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌后的粘连和切口疝
Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):70-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6742.
3
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
4
The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助手术与开放手术治疗结肠癌的随机临床试验的长期结果
Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816a9d65.
5
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.根据COST研究组试验的5年数据,腹腔镜结肠癌切除术并不逊色于开放手术。
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762.
6
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放性结肠癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.
7
Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌:肿瘤学结局的荟萃分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Mar;204(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.008.
8
Immunological effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术的免疫效应:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Arch Surg. 2005 Jul;140(7):692-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.7.692.
9
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术与开腹结肠癌切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651.
10
Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.腹腔镜直肠乙状结肠癌切除术:前瞻性随机试验。
Lancet. 2004 Apr 10;363(9416):1187-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3.