• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高容量外科中心的腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:LAPCOLON 组试验的长期结果

Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial.

作者信息

Huscher Cristiano G S, Bretagnol Frederic, Corcione Francesco

机构信息

Oncologic Surgery, Ospedale Rummo, Benevento, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3050-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-015-3050-4
PMID:25820910
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strong evidence has confirmed the benefit of laparoscopy in colorectal cancer resection but remains a challenging procedure. It is not clear that such promising results in selected patients translate into a favorable risk-benefit balance in real practice. We conducted a multicenter national observational registry to assess operative and oncologic long-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

METHODS

All patients with laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection between 2001 and 2004 were included. Data were extracted from the prospective Italian national database of 10 high-volume centers (≥40 colorectal cancer laparoscopic resections per year). Surgical technique and follow-up were standardized. Survivals were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

We reported 1832 patients with colon (58.5%) and rectal cancer (41.5%). TNM stage was 0-I-II in 1044 patients (57%) and III-IV in 788 patients (43%). Surgery included a totally laparoscopic procedure in 1820 patients (99.3%). Conversion was 10.5%. Postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 17 and 1.2%, respectively. Clinical anastomotic leakage rate was 8.3% (n=152). R0 resection was 95%. With a median follow-up of 54.2 months, cancer recurrence rate was 13.3%. At 5 years, cancer-free survival was 86.7%. Upon multivariate analysis, age (P=0.001) and TNM stage (P<0.001) were associated with cancer-free survival. Predictive factors of cancer recurrence were gender (P=0.029) and TNM stage (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-volume centers and non-selective patients, laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer achieves good operative results with satisfactory long-term oncologic results. Even in the laparoscopy era, age, gender, and TNM stage remain the most powerful predictor of oncologic outcomes.

摘要

背景

有力证据已证实腹腔镜手术在结直肠癌切除术中的益处,但它仍是一项具有挑战性的手术。目前尚不清楚在特定患者中如此有前景的结果在实际临床中是否能转化为良好的风险效益比。我们开展了一项多中心全国性观察性登记研究,以评估腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术后的手术及肿瘤学长期结局。

方法

纳入2001年至2004年间所有接受腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的患者。数据来自意大利10个高容量中心(每年≥40例结直肠癌腹腔镜切除术)的前瞻性全国数据库。手术技术和随访均标准化。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存率。

结果

我们报告了1832例结肠癌患者(58.5%)和直肠癌患者(41.5%)。TNM分期为0-I-II期的患者有1044例(57%),III-IV期的患者有788例(43%)。1820例患者(99.3%)接受了全腹腔镜手术。中转开腹率为10.5%。术后发病率和30天死亡率分别为17%和1.2%。临床吻合口漏发生率为8.3%(n = 152)。R0切除率为95%。中位随访时间为54.2个月,癌症复发率为13.3%。5年时,无癌生存率为86.7%。多因素分析显示,年龄(P = 0.001)和TNM分期(P < 0.001)与无癌生存率相关。癌症复发的预测因素为性别(P = 0.029)和TNM分期(P < 0.001)。

结论

在高容量中心和非选择性患者中,腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术可取得良好的手术效果和令人满意的长期肿瘤学结局。即使在腹腔镜时代,年龄、性别和TNM分期仍是肿瘤学结局最有力的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial.高容量外科中心的腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术:LAPCOLON 组试验的长期结果
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3050-4.
2
Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort.全国范围内结肠癌腹腔镜手术的实施:基于人群队列的短期结果和长期生存情况
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4853-4864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4819-8. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.十年间腹腔镜与开放手术切除结直肠癌的前瞻性比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):601-11. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6616-z.
4
The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.体重指数增加对结肠癌和直肠癌腹腔镜手术的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):778-788. doi: 10.1111/codi.14107. Epub 2018 May 4.
5
Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer?腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌后转化是否会影响短期和肿瘤学结局?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4596-607. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3072-7. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
A single surgeon's experience with 54 consecutive cases of multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: can the laparoscopic approach be performed safely?一名外科医生连续 54 例局部晚期原发性结直肠癌多脏器切除术的经验:腹腔镜方法是否可以安全实施?
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1907-7. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
7
Single Port and Conventional Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery: Comparison of Two Techniques.结直肠手术中的单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术:两种技术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):65-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0331. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
8
Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-center study.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:一项德国五中心研究的结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02237235.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
10
No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.荷兰南部结直肠手术后,低容量医院与高容量医院的结局无差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomograms for predicting the prognosis in multiple primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.预测多原发性食管鳞状细胞癌预后的列线图。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2433685. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2433685. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery VS ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in left colectomy: evaluation of functional outcomes: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.左半结肠切除术中保留肠系膜下动脉与结扎肠系膜下动脉的比较:功能结局评估:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验
Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2413-2415. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01662-w. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
A clinical observational study on the application of enhanced recovery after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature review and recommendations from the Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌:来自法国肿瘤临床实践演变委员会的文献回顾和建议。
Can J Surg. 2013 Oct;56(5):297-310. doi: 10.1503/cjs.005512.
2
Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections.在度过初始学习曲线后,腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的病例选择和结果会发生变化吗?对235例连续择期腹腔镜结直肠切除术的分析。
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jul;9(3):99-103. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.115366.
3
腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后加速康复应用的临床观察研究
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 27;9:961161. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.961161. eCollection 2022.
4
Identifying Core Functions of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Improve Cancer Care Quality in Rural Hospitals.识别基于证据的干预措施在改善农村医院癌症护理质量方面的核心功能。
Front Health Serv. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.891574. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Oral and Parenteral vs. Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: An Intervention Review with Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者口服与胃肠外联合胃肠外途径抗生素预防与单纯胃肠外途径抗生素预防的比较:一项Meta分析的干预性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;11(1):21. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010021.
6
Applicability of minimally invasive surgery for clinically T4 colorectal cancer.微创外科治疗临床 T4 期结直肠癌的适用性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77317-2.
7
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.微创直肠腺癌切除术的长期肿瘤学结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1412-1417. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3751-8. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中转:在人群水平上是否随着时间的推移而有所改善?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3234-3246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6042-2. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis.手助腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1277-2.
10
Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case-control analysis of 7-years' experience.腹腔镜结肠癌 T4 病灶切除术后的肿瘤学结果:7 年经验的病例对照分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1133-1140. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5784-6. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery.
低位直肠癌:外科分类与规范。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):560-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827c4a8c.
4
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
5
Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care.评估佛罗里达州结直肠癌护理质量:来自佛罗里达州癌症护理质量倡议的结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):239-45. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000477. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management.直肠癌手术的量与结局:质量管理的重要性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Feb;28(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1596-2. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
7
Factors influencing the quality of total mesorectal excision.影响全直肠系膜切除术质量的因素。
Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):714-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8692. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
8
Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients.结直肠癌手术后的死亡率:一项涉及 84000 多名患者的法国调查。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):738-43; discussion 743-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823604ac.
9
A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜辅助与传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照试验的短期和长期结果的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Aug;15(8):1375-85. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1547-1. Epub 2011 May 10.
10
Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.英国医学研究理事会 CLASICC 试验:腹腔镜辅助与开腹结直肠癌手术的 5 年随访结果
Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1638-45. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7160.