Suppr超能文献

热面保护会延迟手指冷却,并在冷空气暴露时提高热舒适度。

Thermal face protection delays finger cooling and improves thermal comfort during cold air exposure.

机构信息

Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760-5007, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Dec;111(12):3097-105. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1931-2. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

Abstract

When people dress for cold weather, the face often remains exposed. Facial cooling can decrease finger blood flow, reducing finger temperature (T (f)). This study examined whether thermal face protection limits finger cooling and thereby improves thermal comfort and manual dexterity during prolonged cold exposure. T (f) was measured in ten volunteers dressed in cold-weather clothing as they stood for 60 min facing the wind (-15°C, 3 m s(-1)), once while wearing a balaclava and goggles (BAL), and once with the balaclava pulled down and without goggles (CON). Subjects removed mitts, wearing only thin gloves to perform Purdue Pegboard (PP) tests at 15 and 50 min, and Minnesota Rate of Manipulation (MRM) tests at 30 and 55 min. Subjects rated their thermal sensation and comfort just before the dexterity tests. T (f) decreased (p < 0.05 for time × trial interaction) by 15 min of cold exposure during CON (33.6 ± 1.4-28.7 ± 2.0°C), but not during BAL (33.2 ± 1.4-30.6 ± 3.2°C); and after 30 min T (f) remained warmer during BAL (23.3 ± 5.9°C) than CON (19.2 ± 3.5); however, by 50 min, T (f) was no different between trials (14.1 ± 2.7°C). Performance on PP fell (p < 0.05) by 25% after 50 min in both trials; MRM performance was not altered by cold on either trial. Subjects felt colder (p < 0.05) and more uncomfortable (p < 0.05) during CON, compared to BAL. Thermal face protection was effective for maintaining warmer T (f) and thermal comfort during cold exposure; however, local cooling of the hands during manual dexterity tests reduced this physiological advantage, and performance was not improved.

摘要

当人们为寒冷天气穿衣时,脸部通常仍然暴露在外。面部冷却会减少手指血流量,降低手指温度(T(f))。本研究旨在探讨热面保护是否限制手指冷却,从而在长时间暴露于寒冷环境中改善热舒适度和手部灵巧度。在 10 名志愿者穿着寒冷天气的衣服站立 60 分钟(-15°C,3 m/s)面对风时,测量他们的 T(f),一次是戴着头套和护目镜(BAL),一次是拉下头套但不戴护目镜(CON)。受试者在 15 分钟和 50 分钟时脱下手套,仅戴薄手套进行 Purdue Pegboard(PP)测试,在 30 分钟和 55 分钟时进行 Minnesota Rate of Manipulation(MRM)测试。在灵巧度测试前,受试者对自己的热感觉和舒适度进行了评分。CON 组在暴露于寒冷 15 分钟后 T(f)下降(时间×试验交互作用 p < 0.05)(33.6 ± 1.4-28.7 ± 2.0°C),但 BAL 组没有(33.2 ± 1.4-30.6 ± 3.2°C);暴露 30 分钟后,BAL 组的 T(f)仍比 CON 组温暖(23.3 ± 5.9°C)(19.2 ± 3.5°C);然而,50 分钟后,两试验组的 T(f)没有差异(14.1 ± 2.7°C)。在两个试验中,PP 测试在 50 分钟后均下降(p < 0.05);MRM 测试在任何试验中都没有受到寒冷的影响。与 BAL 相比,CON 时受试者感觉更冷(p < 0.05)和更不舒服(p < 0.05)。热面保护可有效维持寒冷暴露期间手部更温暖的 T(f)和热舒适度;然而,手部灵巧度测试时手部局部冷却削弱了这种生理优势,测试成绩也没有提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验