Sokol Shima C, Amanatullah Derek F, Curtiss Shane, Szabo Robert M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Apr;36(4):591-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.032.
We compare the biomechanical properties of a volar hybrid construct to an all-locking construct in an osteoporotic and normal comminuted distal radius fracture model.
Groups of 28 normal, 28 osteoporotic, and 28 over-drilled osteoporotic left distal radius synthetic bones were used. The normal group consisted of synthetic bone with a standard foam core. The osteoporotic group consisted of synthetic bone with decreased foam core density. The over-drilled osteoporotic group consisted of synthetic bone with decreased foam core density and holes drilled with a 2.3 mm drill, instead of the standard 2.0 mm drill, to simulate the lack of purchase in osteoporotic bone. Within each group, 14 synthetic bones were plated with a volar locking plate using an all-locking screw construct, and 14 synthetic bones were plated with a volar locking plate using a hybrid screw construct (ie, both locking and nonlocking screws). A 1-cm dorsal wedge osteotomy was created with the apex 2 cm from the volar surface of the lunate facet. Each specimen was mounted to a materials testing machine, using a custom-built, standardized axial compression jig. Axial compression was delivered at 1 N/s over 3 cycles from 20 N to 100 N to establish stiffness. Each sample was stressed to failure at 1 mm/s until 5 mm of permanent deformation occurred.
Our results show no difference in construct stiffness and load at failure between the all-locking and hybrid constructs in the normal, osteoporotic, or over-drilled osteoporotic synthetic bone models. All specimens failed by plate bending at the osteotomy site with loss of height.
Although volar locking plates are commonly used for the treatment of distal radius fractures, the ideal screw configuration has not been determined. Hybrid fixation has comparable biomechanical properties to all locking constructs in the fixation of metaphyseal fractures about the knee and shoulder and might also have a role in the fixation of distal radius fractures.
在骨质疏松性和正常粉碎性桡骨远端骨折模型中,比较掌侧混合固定结构与全锁定固定结构的生物力学性能。
使用了28个正常、28个骨质疏松和28个过度钻孔的骨质疏松性左桡骨远端合成骨样本。正常组由具有标准泡沫芯的合成骨组成。骨质疏松组由泡沫芯密度降低的合成骨组成。过度钻孔的骨质疏松组由泡沫芯密度降低且用2.3毫米钻头钻孔而非标准2.0毫米钻头钻孔的合成骨组成,以模拟骨质疏松骨中固定不牢的情况。在每组中,14个合成骨用全锁定螺钉结构的掌侧锁定钢板固定,14个合成骨用混合螺钉结构(即锁定和非锁定螺钉)的掌侧锁定钢板固定。在距月骨小关节掌侧表面2厘米处的顶点处进行1厘米的背侧楔形截骨。使用定制的标准化轴向压缩夹具将每个标本安装到材料试验机上。轴向压缩以1 N/s的速度在3个循环中从20 N增加到100 N以确定刚度。每个样本以1 mm/s的速度加载直至破坏,直到发生5 mm的永久变形。
我们的结果表明,在正常、骨质疏松或过度钻孔的骨质疏松合成骨模型中,全锁定和混合固定结构在固定刚度和破坏载荷方面没有差异。所有标本均在截骨部位因钢板弯曲而失败,高度丢失。
尽管掌侧锁定钢板常用于治疗桡骨远端骨折,但理想的螺钉配置尚未确定。混合固定在膝关节和肩关节周围干骺端骨折的固定中具有与全锁定固定结构相当的生物力学性能,并且在桡骨远端骨折的固定中可能也有作用。