• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对乳腺癌风险适度变化的基因检测的关注:对单核苷酸多态性检测的影响。

Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.

作者信息

Graves K D, Peshkin B N, Luta G, Tuong W, Schwartz M D

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA. kdg9 @ georgetown.edu

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(3):178-89. doi: 10.1159/000324703. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1159/000324703
PMID:21464556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3104870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in genomics may eventually lead to 'personalized genetic medicine,' yet the clinical utility of predictive testing for modest changes in risk is unclear. We explored interest in genetic testing for genes related to modest changes in breast cancer risk in women at moderate to high risk for breast cancer.

METHODS

Women (n = 105) with a negative breast biopsy and ≥1 relative with breast or ovarian cancer completed telephone surveys. We measured demographic and psychosocial variables and, following presentation of hypothetical scenarios of genetic tests for lower-penetrance breast cancer gene mutations, assessed interest in willingness to pay for and comprehension of test results. We used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to evaluate combinations of risk level, cost and behavioral modifiers.

RESULTS

Many women (77%) reported 'definite' interest in genetic testing, with greater interest in tests that conveyed more risk and cost less. Behavioral modifiers of risk (taking a vitamin; diet/exercise), having a regular physician, greater perceived benefits of genetic testing, and greater cancer worry also influenced interest. Most participants (63%) did not understand relative vs. absolute risk. Women with less understanding reported more cancer worry and greater willingness to pay for testing.

CONCLUSION

Interest in genetic testing for mutations related to modest changes in risk was high, modified by both test and psychosocial factors. Findings highlight the need for education about benefits and risks of testing for mutations that convey modest changes in risk, particularly given the current lack of clinical validity/utility and availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

摘要

背景

基因组学的进展最终可能会带来“个性化基因医学”,然而,针对风险适度变化的预测性检测的临床效用尚不清楚。我们探讨了中度至高度乳腺癌风险女性对与乳腺癌风险适度变化相关基因的基因检测的兴趣。

方法

对105名乳腺活检结果为阴性且有≥1名患乳腺癌或卵巢癌亲属的女性进行电话调查。我们测量了人口统计学和心理社会变量,并在呈现低 penetrance 乳腺癌基因突变基因检测的假设情景后,评估了对支付意愿和检测结果理解的兴趣。我们使用带有广义估计方程的逻辑回归模型来评估风险水平、成本和行为调节因素的组合。

结果

许多女性(77%)表示对基因检测“肯定”感兴趣,对传达更多风险且成本更低的检测更感兴趣。风险的行为调节因素(服用维生素;饮食/运动)、有固定的医生、对基因检测的更大感知益处以及更大的癌症担忧也影响了兴趣。大多数参与者(63%)不理解相对风险与绝对风险。理解较少的女性报告有更多的癌症担忧和更高的检测支付意愿。

结论

对与风险适度变化相关的基因突变的基因检测兴趣很高,受检测和心理社会因素的影响。研究结果强调了对传达风险适度变化的基因突变检测的益处和风险进行教育的必要性,特别是考虑到目前缺乏临床有效性/效用以及直接面向消费者的基因检测的可用性。

相似文献

1
Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.对乳腺癌风险适度变化的基因检测的关注:对单核苷酸多态性检测的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(3):178-89. doi: 10.1159/000324703. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
2
Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.关于结直肠癌风险适度增加的基因检测的兴趣和信息偏好。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(1):48-60. doi: 10.1159/000356567. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
3
The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌感知风险的影响:PGen研究结果
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Oct 15;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0140-y.
4
Personalized Medicine Through SNP Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: Clinical Implementation.通过单核苷酸多态性检测评估乳腺癌风险实现个性化医疗:临床应用
J Genet Couns. 2015 Oct;24(5):744-51. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9803-7. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
5
Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.关于采用预测试教育方法以增强BRCA1基因检测知情决策的对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 15;89(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148.
6
Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.与BRCA1/2基因阴性家族中女性对基因检测组合的兴趣及风险沟通偏好相关的因素
J Genet Couns. 2017 Jun;26(3):480-490. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0001-7. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
7
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.
8
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.女性 BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):666-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8430.
9
Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks.理解单核苷酸多态性:女性对获取个人乳腺癌风险概况的理解与经历
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):702-708. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0162-z. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Psychometric testing of the decisional conflict scale: genetic testing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.决策冲突量表的心理测量学测试:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测。
Nurs Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;60(6):368-77. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182337dad.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women.关于将BRCA1/2癌症易感性检测纳入阿什肯纳兹犹太男性和女性生殖携带者筛查的态度和兴趣。
J Community Genet. 2022 Jun;13(3):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00590-3. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant.关于携带 BRCA1/2 或 PALB2 致病性变异的女性亲属的乳腺癌遗传和非遗传风险因素的信息需求。
Breast. 2021 Dec;60:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
"I think that a brief conversation from their provider can go a very long way": Patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators of genetic testing after ovarian cancer.“我认为,他们的提供者进行简短的交谈就可以大有帮助”:卵巢癌患者和提供者对遗传检测障碍和促进因素的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 May;29(5):2663-2677. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05779-1. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
4
Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.说明癌症风险:患者对于一项新型BRCA1/2基因风险修饰检测的风险沟通偏好及兴趣
Public Health Genomics. 2020;23(1-2):6-19. doi: 10.1159/000505854. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.影响乳腺癌患者对遗传风险信息需求的因素:从信息不足到信息需求
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):543-557. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1087. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Women's preferences, willingness-to-pay, and predicted uptake for single-nucleotide polymorphism gene testing to guide personalized breast cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.女性对单核苷酸多态性基因检测以指导个性化乳腺癌筛查策略的偏好、支付意愿及预测接受度:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 18;12:1837-1852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S171348. eCollection 2018.
7
The Patient in Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review Examining Evaluations of Patient-Facing Materials.精准医学中的患者:系统评价考察患者面对的材料的评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Sep 3;2018:9541621. doi: 10.1155/2018/9541621. eCollection 2018.
8
High-risk women's risk perception after receiving personalized polygenic breast cancer risk information.高危女性在收到个性化多基因乳腺癌风险信息后的风险认知。
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0378-0. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Disentangling the determinants of interest and willingness-to-pay for breast cancer susceptibility testing in the general population: a cross-sectional Web-based survey among women of Québec (Canada).解析普通人群对乳腺癌易感性检测的兴趣和支付意愿的决定因素:在加拿大魁北克省女性中开展的一项基于网络的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 27;8(2):e016662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016662.
10
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.英国公众对基于互联网的个人基因组检测的兴趣调查。
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 19;5(10):e13473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013473.
2
Methodological Issues in Multistage Genome-wide Association Studies.多阶段全基因组关联研究中的方法学问题
Stat Sci. 2009 Nov 1;24(4):414-429. doi: 10.1214/09-sts288.
3
Testing for CHEK2 in the cancer genetics clinic: ready for prime time?癌症遗传学诊所中CHEK2的检测:准备好进入黄金时代了吗?
Clin Genet. 2010 Jul;78(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01402.x.
4
Will knowledge of gene-based colorectal cancer disease risk influence quality of life and screening behavior? Findings from a population-based study.基于基因的结直肠癌疾病风险知识会影响生活质量和筛查行为吗?一项基于人群的研究结果。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(1):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000206346. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
5
The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors?对个性化基因信息的行为反应:基因风险概况是否会激励个人和家庭选择更健康的行为?
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:89-103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103532.
6
Smoking cessation: the potential role of risk assessment tools as motivational triggers.戒烟:风险评估工具作为激励触发因素的潜在作用。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Jan;86(1011):26-33; quiz 31-2. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.084947.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性的基因和基因组检测
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):893-901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0660. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
8
Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findings.公众对预测性基因检测(包括直接面向消费者的检测)的兴趣,用于评估对重度抑郁症的易感性:初步研究结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jan;18(1):47-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.138.
9
Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.在线个性化基因组风险评估用户的特征:对医患互动的影响。
Genet Med. 2009 Aug;11(8):582-7. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b22c3a.
10
What can interest tell us about uptake of genetic testing? Intention and behavior amongst smokers related to patients with lung cancer.兴趣能告诉我们关于基因检测的接受情况吗?吸烟者中与肺癌患者相关的意向和行为。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(2):116-24. doi: 10.1159/000226595. Epub 2009 Jun 29.