Wong Xin Yi, Groothuis-Oudshoorn Catharina Gm, Tan Chuen Seng, van Til Janine A, Hartman Mikael, Chong Kok Joon, IJzerman Maarten J, Wee Hwee-Lin
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore,
Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 18;12:1837-1852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S171348. eCollection 2018.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) gene test is a potential tool for improving the accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction. We seek to measure women's preferences and marginal willingness-to-pay (mWTP) for this new technology.
We administered a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to English-speaking Singaporean women aged 40-69 years without any history of breast cancer, enrolled via door-to-door recruitment with quota sampling by age and ethnicity. DCE attributes comprise: 1) sample type (buccal swab and dried blood spot), 2) person conducting pretest discussion (specialist doctor, non-specialist doctor, and nurse educator), 3) test location (private family clinic, public primary-care clinic, and hospital), and 4) out-of-pocket cost (S$50, S$175, and S$300). Mixed logit model was used to estimate the effect of attribute levels on women's preferences and mWTP. Interactions between significant attributes and respondent characteristics were investigated. Predicted uptake rates for various gene testing scenarios were studied.
A total of 300 women aged 52.6±7.6 years completed the survey (100 Chinese, Malay, and Indian women, respectively). Sample type (=0.046), person conducting pretest discussion, and out-of-pocket cost (<0.001) are significantly associated with going for SNP gene testing. Women with higher income and education levels are more willing to pay higher prices for the test. Preferences in terms of mWTP across ethnic groups appear similar, but Chinese women have greater preference heterogeneity for the attributes. Predicted uptake for a feasible scenario consisting of buccal swab, pretest discussion with nurse educator at the hospital costing S$50 is 60.5%. Only 3.3% of women always opted out of the SNP gene test in real life. Reasons include high cost, poor awareness, and indifference toward test results.
SNP gene testing may be tailored according to individual preferences to encourage uptake. Future research should focus on outcomes and cost-effectiveness of personalized breast cancer screening using SNP gene testing.
单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测是提高乳腺癌风险预测准确性的一种潜在工具。我们旨在衡量女性对这项新技术的偏好和边际支付意愿(mWTP)。
我们对年龄在40 - 69岁、无乳腺癌病史、通过按年龄和种族配额抽样进行挨家挨户招募的讲英语的新加坡女性进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE)。DCE属性包括:1)样本类型(口腔拭子和干血斑),2)进行预测试讨论的人员(专科医生、非专科医生和护士教育工作者),3)检测地点(私立家庭诊所、公立基层医疗诊所和医院),4)自付费用(50新元、175新元、300新元)。使用混合逻辑模型估计属性水平对女性偏好和mWTP的影响。研究了显著属性与受访者特征之间的相互作用。研究了各种基因检测方案的预测接受率。
共有300名年龄为52.6±7.6岁的女性完成了调查(分别为100名华裔、马来裔和印度裔女性)。样本类型(=0.046)、进行预测试讨论的人员以及自付费用(<0.001)与进行SNP基因检测显著相关。收入和教育水平较高的女性更愿意为检测支付更高的价格。各民族在mWTP方面的偏好似乎相似,但华裔女性对属性的偏好异质性更大。由口腔拭子、在医院与护士教育工作者进行预测试讨论且费用为50新元组成的可行方案的预测接受率为60.5%。在现实生活中,只有3.3%的女性总是选择不进行SNP基因检测。原因包括费用高、意识淡薄以及对检测结果漠不关心。
SNP基因检测可根据个人偏好进行调整以鼓励接受。未来的研究应关注使用SNP基因检测进行个性化乳腺癌筛查的结果和成本效益。